Violence “Out of Place” or Positivity Is Not for Everyone. Review of the Book by Byung-Chul Han “Topology of Violence. A Critique of Late Modern Positivity Society”

Authors

  • Sergey N. Borisov Belgorod State National Research University
  • Roman A. Dmitrakov Belgorod State National Research University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-3-615-618

Keywords:

violence, man, culture, modernity, society, positivity, communication, space

Abstract

In his work “Topology of Violence. Critique of the positivity society of late modernity”, Byung-Chul Han builds his own concept of violence based on the thesis about the significant difference between late modern society and all previous stages of social development. First of all, according to the author, it lies in the transition from negative to positive violence. Negative violence is understood as a binary opposition between foe and enemy, self and foe, self and super-ego. Positive violence is devoid of binary and is therefore directed inside society and the individual, being inherently self-violent. A critical reading of Byung-Chul Han allows us to conclude that the rejection of binaries in the study of violence is counterproductive, which remains relevant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sergey N. Borisov, Belgorod State National Research University

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theology

E-mail: 1034387@bsu.edu.ru

Roman A. Dmitrakov, Belgorod State National Research University

Graduate student, Department of Philosophy and Theology

References

Агамбен Дж. 2018. Царство и Слава. К теологической генеалогии экономики и управления. М.-СПб., Изд-во Института Гайдара, 552 с.

Борисов С.Н., Римский В.П. 2013. Тертуллиан, медиа и трансгуманизм: онтология свободы и антропология насилия в постсекулярном мире. Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Серия: Философия. Социология. Право, 2(145): 5-17.

Борисов С.Н., Римский В.П. 2020. Hermeneutics of Translation and Understanding of Violence. Philosophy and Society, 31-2 (2020): 139–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002165B.

Жирар Р. 2010. Насилие и священное. М., Новое литературное обозрение, 448 с.

Стэндинг Г. 2014. Прекариат. Новый опасный класс. М., АдМаргинем Пресс, 328 с.

Хан Бён-Чхоль. 2024. Топология насилия. Критика общества позитивности позднего модерна. Перевод с немецкого С. Мухамеджанова. М., АСТ, 192 с. (Byung-Chul Han. Topologie der gewalt. MSB Matthes & Seitz Berlin Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin. 2013).


Abstract views: 8

Share

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Borisov, S. N., & Dmitrakov, R. A. (2024). Violence “Out of Place” or Positivity Is Not for Everyone. Review of the Book by Byung-Chul Han “Topology of Violence. A Critique of Late Modern Positivity Society”. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 49(3), 615-618. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-3-615-618

Issue

Section

Scientific life, communications and reviews