Theology and Non-Theology: The Authenticity of the Theological Vocation in Karl Barth's Concept

Authors

  • Sergey А. Kolesnikov Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Belgorod Orthodox Theological Seminary (with a missionary component) of "Belgorod and Stary Oskol Diocese" Orthodox religious organization, Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-3-582-591

Keywords:

K. Barth, theological vocation, theology and modernity, theology and cognition

Abstract

For an effective development of modern theology, it is important to find and understand the boundaries of the authenticity of the theological interpretation of the world, the parameters that become key to the correct disclosure of the theological vocation. The problem of the presence of theology in the modern epistemological context includes the definition of what theology is as a special way of knowing, and what theology is not, what it cannot be in its essence.  Despite the obvious importance of such presentation of the problem, systematic research in this direction is still insufficient to identify the entire problematic horizon associated with the vision of the field of theology authenticity. The purpose of this study is to identify the contours of a genuine and inauthentic understanding of the theological vocation, and to comprehend the epistemological task of theology on the example of K. Barth's theological system. The methods of comparison, analysis, deduction, induction, and the axiomatic method are used as methodological tools in the article. As a result of the research, such parameters of the authenticity of the theological vocation were revealed as epistemological humility, acceptance of the experience of non-obviousness, which forms the cognitive mobility of theology between understanding and mystery; a sacred attitude to verbal cognition based on theological dialogicality, and the skill of theological listening to the transcendental overtones of Revelation. The results obtained contribute to the development of a conceptual understanding of theological research authenticity based on the principles of acceptance of grace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sergey А. Kolesnikov, Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Belgorod Orthodox Theological Seminary (with a missionary component) of "Belgorod and Stary Oskol Diocese" Orthodox religious organization, Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate)

Doctor of Philology, Professor; Vice-Rector for Research

E-mail: skolesnikov2015@yandex.ru

References

Барт К. 2005. Послание к Римлянам. М., ББИ, 580 с.

Барт К. 2006. Введение в евангелическую теологию. М., Центр Нарния, 192 с.

Барт К. 2007. Церковная догматика. Том I. М., ББИ, 560 с.

Барт К. 2010. Толкование Посланий к Римлянам и Филиппийцам. М., ББИ, 306 с.

Брянчанинов И., свят. Творения.Т. 4. СПб. 1905, 422 с.

Жильсон Э. 2004. Философия в средние века: от истоков патристики до конца XIV века. М., Республика, 678 с.

Кюнг Г. 2000. Великие христианские мыслители. СПб., Алетейя, 442 с.

Новая философская энциклопедия в 4-х т. 2010. Т. 4. М., Мысль, 736 с.

Православная энциклопедия. 2002. Т. 4. М., АО Московские учебники и картолитография, 751 с.

Тиллих П. 1925. Диалектическая теология. Путь, 1: 148–154.

Эразм Роттердамский. 1991. Похвала глупости. М., Советская Россия, 464 с.

Brunner Emil. 1946. Natural theology, comprising "Nature and Grace" and the reply "No!" by Dr. Karl Barth. London, Geoffrey Bles, The Centenary Press.

Jenson R. W. 1969. God after God: The God of the Past and the Future as Seen in the Work of Karl Barth. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 218 р.

Kuo-An Wu. 2011. The Concept of History in the Theology of Karl Barth. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.


Abstract views: 7

Share

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

KolesnikovS. А. (2024). Theology and Non-Theology: The Authenticity of the Theological Vocation in Karl Barth’s Concept. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 49(3), 582-591. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-3-582-591

Issue

Section

Religious studies and state-confessional relations