Cultural-Historical Practice: To the History of One Concept. Part 2

Authors

  • Sergey N. Borisov Belgorod State National Research University
  • Natalya A. Drobotova Belgorod State National Research University
  • Roman A. Dmitrakov Belgorod State National Research University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-17-25

Keywords:

activity, person, culture, history, practice, cultural and historical practice

Abstract

The article is a continuation of the analysis of the concept of cultural-historical practice, popular in the philosophy of the 20th century and now found on the periphery of philosophical discourse. The purpose of this article is to study the potential of the concept of cultural and historical practice for understanding the urgent problems of cultural diversity. The authors show changes in the semantic content of the concept of "practice" from the Soviet philosophical tradition to modern philosophy. The dynamics of the key meanings of practice is revealed in the context of correlation with the concept of history, culture and technology. The conclusion is made about the change in the discourse about practice towards understanding practice as a multiple phenomenon that occurred as a result of the collision of European thinking with the "challenge" of history, other ways of life and many cultures, as well as technology as a necessary and at the same time dangerous "avatar" of the other.

Author Biographies

Sergey N. Borisov, Belgorod State National Research University

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

Natalya A. Drobotova, Belgorod State National Research University

PhD Student, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

Roman A. Dmitrakov, Belgorod State National Research University

PhD Student, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Belgorod State National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

References

Агамбен Дж. 2018. Царство и Слава. К теологической генеалогии экономики и управления. М., Издательство Института Гайдара, 552 с.

Волков В.В., Хархордин О.В. 2008. Теория практик. СПб., Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 298 с.

Ламетри Ж.О. 1983. Сочинения. М., Мысль, 509 с.

Маркарян Э.С. 2014. Избранное. Наука о культуре и императивы эпохи. ЦГИ Принт.

Петров М.К. 2004. Язык. Знак. Культура. М., Едиториал УРСС, 328 с.

Саид Э. 2006. Ориентализм. Западные концепции Востока. СПб., 636 c.

Серто Мишель де 2013. Изобретение повседневности. 1. Искусство делать. СПб., Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 330 с.

Стиглер Б. 1994. La technique et le temps. Tome 1, La faute d’Epiméthée: 59-60. URL: https://www. overdrive.com/media/6375508/la-technique-et-le-temps (дата обращения: 3 сентября 2023)

Фуко М. 1999. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы. М., AdMarginem, 489 с.

Хайдеггер М. 1993. Бытие и время: статьи и выступления. М., Республика, 447 с.

Эриксен Т.Э. 2014. Что такое антропология? М., Изд. дом ВШЭ, 114 с.

Юк Хуэй 2023. Вопрос о технике в Китае. Вопрос о космотехнике. М., АдМаргинем Пресс, 320 с.


Abstract views: 59

Share

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Borisov, S. N., Drobotova, N. A., & Dmitrakov, R. A. (2024). Cultural-Historical Practice: To the History of One Concept. Part 2. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 49(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-17-25

Issue

Section

Logic, methodology and philosophy of science