Experimental legislation: theoretical questions
Keywords:
legislative activity, regulatory technologies, experimental legal regime, experimental legislation, theory of law, administrative law, regulation as an experimentAbstract
The article examines theoretical approaches based on the application of experimental legal regimes. This article is part of the scientific legal doctrine of experimental legislation developed by the author. The author explains in detail the concept of "regulation as an experiment" - one of the approaches in the palette of the latest regulatory technologies. The author shows that experimentation in legislation has, at the same time, a long history in different states. The article examines the concept, nature and ontology of experimental legislation. The author shows the ambiguity of this concept in the scientific literature. The article touches upon the essential characteristics of experimenting with legislation, shows the significant tasks and principles of such experimentation. The requirements for experimental legislation and the conditions for its use are also reflected in the article. The author dwells on the question of the advantages and disadvantages of applying an experimental approach to legal support. The article ends with the conclusion that the nature of the experimental legislation can be partially revealed through the articulation of the goal setting laid down in the experimental legislation (which is what the author did).
Downloads
References
Понкин И.В., Куприяновский В.П., Понкин Д.И. 2020. Fintech, Regtech и регуляторные песочницы: понятие, цифровая онтология, перспективы. Современные информационные технологии и ИТ-образование, 16 (1): 224–234. DOI: 10.25559/SITITO.16.202001.224-234
Понкин И.В., Куприяновский В.П., Морева С.Л., Понкин Д.И. 2020. Подрывные технологические инновации: понятие, значение и онтология. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8 (8): 60–68.
Понкин И.В. 2020. Концепт машиночитаемого и машиноисполняемого права: актуальность, назначение, место в РегТехе, содержание, онтология и перспективы. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8 (9): 59–69.
Понкин И.В., Редькина А.И. 2020. Цифровое государственное управление: метод цифровых моделей-двойников (BIM) в праве. Государственная служба, 22 (2): 64–69.
Понкин И.В., Редькина А.И. 2019. Цифровая формализация права. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 7 (1): 39–48.
Abramowicz M.B. 2008. Randomized Legal Experimentation. GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works. Paper, 447: 66 p.
Calliess C. 2020. Towards a European Innovation Principle Endorsed by Better Regulation. Berliner Online-Beiträge zum Europarecht, 118: 15 p.
Cormacain R. 2020. Rule of Law Monitoring of Legislation – Coronavirus Bill. The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law). <https://www.biicl.org/documents/91_83_coronavirus_bill_rule_of_law_scrutiny_final.pdf>. 20 p.
Du H., Heldeweg M.A. 2018. An experimental approach to regulating non-military unmanned aircraft systems. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 24 p.
Gestel, van R., Dijck, van G. 2011. Better Regulation through Experimental Legislation. European Public Law, 17 (3): 539–553.
Gubler Z.J. 2014. Experimental Rules. Boston College Law Review, 55 (1): 129–179.
Pascual G.D. 2004. Los experimentos jurídicos. Revista de Administración Pública. Mayo–Agosto, 164: 145–187.
Ranchordás S. 2013. The whys and woes of experimental legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 1 (3): 415–440.
Rogers-Dillon R.H. 2004. The Welfare Experiments: Politics and Policy Evaluation. Stanford (California): Stanford Law and Politics. xiii; 253 p.
Salminen V., Halme K. 2020. Innovation-friendly regulation: Current state and good practices (Executive Summary) // <https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162229/Innovationfriendly%20regulation-Current%20state%20and%20good%20practices.pdf>. 17 p.
Van Gestel R., van Dijck G. 2011. Better Regulation through Experimental Legislation. European Public Law, 17 (3): 539–553.
Zeisel H. 1956. Some Reflections on Legal Experimentation. Stanford Law Review, 8: 730–748.
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.