Citizen science as an instrument of science communication: analysis of Russian practice

Authors

  • Ani G. Gazoyan Krasnodar State Institute of Culture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-810-817

Keywords:

participation of volunteers in the study, science communication, researches, science popularization, scientific ethics

Abstract

Citizen science is a practice of participation of volunteers without special education in research projects. Projects in this area are an integral part of the scientific culture of many countries. Citizen science allows scientists to engage assistants for solving routine tasks and allows volunteers to feel attached to scientific research. Citizen science is also able to build loyalty to science and the academic community among a wide audience and recruit young and talented people. In addition citizen science can be an effective tool for science communication. Сitizen science has widely disseminated with the advent of computer and Internet technologies. However in Russia despite the rich history of popularization of science citizen science-projects are not so popular. The concept “citizen science” does not even have a full-value Russian-language term-analogue. The article is devoted to the analysis of the causes and consequences of low representation of citizen science in Russia. The article uses the methods of survey, Internet audit and expert interview. It is shown that the development of citizen science constitutes many theoretical problems. Besides the practice of citizen science is poorly developed in Russia and scientists have difficulties with recruiting volunteers for their studies.

Author Biography

Ani G. Gazoyan, Krasnodar State Institute of Culture

postgraduate student of the Department of Pedagogy, Psychology and Philosophy of the Krasnodar State Institute of Culture,

Krasnodar, Russia

References

Гребенщикова Е. Г. 2016. 2016.03.002. Куртис В. Мотивация к участию в онлайн-играх науки граждан: Изучение "Foldit". Curtis V. Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: a study of Foldit. – 2015. – vol. 37, N 6. – С. 723–746. – DOI:10.1177/1075547015609322. Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 8, Науковедение: Реферативный журнал, 3: 11–16.

Волкова А.В. 2019. Потенциал «гражданской науки» в общественно-политическом развитии. Социально-политические исследования, 1: 41–50.

Широканова А.А. 2013. Научная коммуникация в информационном обществе: социологический анализ: автореф. дис. ... канд. социол. наук: 22.00.01. Минск.

Гриценко В.П. Данильченко Т.Ю. 2018. «Островная наука» и мейнстрим. В кн.: Инновационные процессы в информационно-коммуникационной сфере. Сборник материалов Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, Краснодар, 15 марта 2018 г. Краснодар: 11–14

Железняк В.Н. 2017. Наука без ученой степени. Вестник ПНИПУ. Культура. История. Философия. Право, 1: 37–44. DOI: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.1.05

Шевченко С.Ю. 2018. Народная наука: отличимы ли люди от бактерий? Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 55(1): 171–183. DOI: 10.5840/eps201855115

Друкер П. 2007. Эпоха разрыва: ориентиры для нашего быстро меняющегося общества: Пер. с англ. Б.Л. Глушакова. М., Изд. дом «Вильямс», 311 с.

Bautista-Puig N., Filippo D., Mauleón E., Sanz-Casado E. 2019. Scientific Landscape of Citizen Science Publications: Dynamics, Content and Presence in Social Media. Publications, 7 (1): 1–22.

Gilfedder M., Robinson C., Watson J., Campbell T., Sullivan B., Possingham H. 2019. Brokering Trust in Citizen Science. Society & Natural Resources, 32 (3): 292–302.

Skarlatidou A., Ponti M., Sprinks J., Nold C., Haklay M., Kanjo E. 201

Share

Published

2021-02-19

How to Cite

Gazoyan, A. G. (2021). Citizen science as an instrument of science communication: analysis of Russian practice. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 45(4), 810-817. https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-810-817

Issue

Section

Thesis