Citizen science as an instrument of science communication: analysis of Russian practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-810-817Keywords:
participation of volunteers in the study, science communication, researches, science popularization, scientific ethicsAbstract
Citizen science is a practice of participation of volunteers without special education in research projects. Projects in this area are an integral part of the scientific culture of many countries. Citizen science allows scientists to engage assistants for solving routine tasks and allows volunteers to feel attached to scientific research. Citizen science is also able to build loyalty to science and the academic community among a wide audience and recruit young and talented people. In addition citizen science can be an effective tool for science communication. Сitizen science has widely disseminated with the advent of computer and Internet technologies. However in Russia despite the rich history of popularization of science citizen science-projects are not so popular. The concept “citizen science” does not even have a full-value Russian-language term-analogue. The article is devoted to the analysis of the causes and consequences of low representation of citizen science in Russia. The article uses the methods of survey, Internet audit and expert interview. It is shown that the development of citizen science constitutes many theoretical problems. Besides the practice of citizen science is poorly developed in Russia and scientists have difficulties with recruiting volunteers for their studies.
Downloads
References
Гребенщикова Е. Г. 2016. 2016.03.002. Куртис В. Мотивация к участию в онлайн-играх науки граждан: Изучение "Foldit". Curtis V. Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: a study of Foldit. – 2015. – vol. 37, N 6. – С. 723–746. – DOI:10.1177/1075547015609322. Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 8, Науковедение: Реферативный журнал, 3: 11–16.
Волкова А.В. 2019. Потенциал «гражданской науки» в общественно-политическом развитии. Социально-политические исследования, 1: 41–50.
Широканова А.А. 2013. Научная коммуникация в информационном обществе: социологический анализ: автореф. дис. ... канд. социол. наук: 22.00.01. Минск.
Гриценко В.П. Данильченко Т.Ю. 2018. «Островная наука» и мейнстрим. В кн.: Инновационные процессы в информационно-коммуникационной сфере. Сборник материалов Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, Краснодар, 15 марта 2018 г. Краснодар: 11–14
Железняк В.Н. 2017. Наука без ученой степени. Вестник ПНИПУ. Культура. История. Философия. Право, 1: 37–44. DOI: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.1.05
Шевченко С.Ю. 2018. Народная наука: отличимы ли люди от бактерий? Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 55(1): 171–183. DOI: 10.5840/eps201855115
Друкер П. 2007. Эпоха разрыва: ориентиры для нашего быстро меняющегося общества: Пер. с англ. Б.Л. Глушакова. М., Изд. дом «Вильямс», 311 с.
Bautista-Puig N., Filippo D., Mauleón E., Sanz-Casado E. 2019. Scientific Landscape of Citizen Science Publications: Dynamics, Content and Presence in Social Media. Publications, 7 (1): 1–22.
Gilfedder M., Robinson C., Watson J., Campbell T., Sullivan B., Possingham H. 2019. Brokering Trust in Citizen Science. Society & Natural Resources, 32 (3): 292–302.
Skarlatidou A., Ponti M., Sprinks J., Nold C., Haklay M., Kanjo E. 201
Abstract views: 489
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.