The coronavirus pandemic as a consequence of western worldviews

Authors

  • Dmitry K. Manokhin Belgorod National Research University
  • Mikhail V. Struchaev Belgorod National Research University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-667-674

Keywords:

coronavirus, epidemy, worldview, individualism, world transforming, hedonism, Taoism

Abstract

This is not the first time a pandemic has occurred in the history of mankind. Each time it’s
accompanied by a revaluation of the life’s meaning and the ways to solve various problems. There are
few works that comprehend the philosophical origins of the coronavirus pandemic, since COVID-19 itself
appeared relatively recently, at the end of 2019. The authors attempt to consider the occurrence of the
coronavirus pandemic as a result of the world community development along the Western path. The
principles of individualism, hedonism and the world transformation become the main philosophical
attitudes of life and activity. At the same time, the authors compare the Western approach and the
traditional Eastern one, using Taoism philosophy when considering the listed ideas. Taoist philosophy
explains well the reasons that led to the pandemic, puts forward opposite attitudes as a way of life and  activity. The authors also conclude that the appearance of new viruses is a nature’s expected response to a
certain anthropogenic impact. And a human will have to adapt to them, develop various protection
systems, both external and internal. To do this, we need to reconsider the nature of your interaction with
outer world. This will eventually lead humanity to a new, higher stage of its development.

Author Biographies

Dmitry K. Manokhin, Belgorod National Research University

candidate of philosophy, associate professor of Belgorod State National Research University,

Belgorod, Russia

Mikhail V. Struchaev, Belgorod National Research University

candidate of philosophy, associate professor of Belgorod State National Research University,

Belgorod, Russia

References

Кара-Мурза С.Г. 1990. Наука и кризис цивилизации. Вопросы философии, 9: 3–15.

Мамардашвили М.К. 1995. Лекции о Прусте (психологическая топология пути). М., Ad Marginem, 548 с.

Нидам Дж. 1966. Общество и наука на Востоке и на Западе. В кн.: Наука о науке: сборник статей. Под ред. В. Н. Столетова. М., Прогресс: 155–160.

Стручаев М.В. 2018. Новые стратегии человеческой деятельности: даосская философская традиция и современная научная парадигма. Научные ведомости БелГУ: Философия. Социология. Право, 43 (1): 188–193. DOI: 10.18413/2075-4566-2018-43-1-188-193

Уайт Л. 1990. Исторические корни нашего экологического кризиса. В кн.: Глобальные проблемы и общечеловеческие ценности. М., Прогресс: 188–202.

Щипков А.В. 2020. Политическая философия коронавируса. Международная жизнь, 5: 12–19.

Beilin M.V., Chistyakova E.Y., Gazniuk L.M., Kuznetsov A.V., Manohin D.K., Struchaev M.V. 2018. Anthropogenic activity: risks and protection safety of human life. Revista Publicando, 5No 16(1): 598–605.

Share

Published

2021-02-17

How to Cite

Manokhin, D. K., & Struchaev, M. V. (2021). The coronavirus pandemic as a consequence of western worldviews. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 45(4), 667-674. https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-667-674

Issue

Section

Human. Culture. Society