Sociological analysis of the spread of virtual mobility as a form of spatial movement virtualization (based on John Urry's sociology of mobility)

Authors

  • Alexander V. Khodykin Samara State Economic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-3-579-588

Keywords:

John Urry, mobility, virtual reality, space, social theory

Abstract

The paper presents a study of virtual mobility as a way to overcome the resistance of physical space by creating a virtual image of it, which allows a person to be in a different place from where he is physically, through virtual reality. Based on the works of the British sociologist John Urry, the author investigated virtual mobility from the point of view of the sociology of space. The analysis of the sociology of mobility of Urry allowed us to identify three chronological stages of the formation of mobility associated with the invention and introduction of new techniques and technologies. The first stage (XIX century) is associated with the mechanization of movement. The second stage (XX century) includes mass production of internal combustion engines, their improvement and the emergence of new modes of transport. The third stage (the turn of the XX–XXI centuries) characterizes the revolutionary development of communication due to a sharp increase in the mobility of information, which made possible the active development of virtual mobility. Virtual mobility makes events that are remote in physical space close in virtual space and available for virtual participation in them. The author has studied the following information technology capabilities: online map services containing panoramic images; satellite images and photos of localities; video recordings of trips; travel films; virtual excursions; educational virtual mobility; video trips to extreme places and virtual travel in Outer Space.
Urry's sociology of mobility has become the starting point for the theorizing that forms the sociology of virtual mobility. All other concepts, whether it is the sociology of space or the theory of virtuality, become additional resources for theorizing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alexander V. Khodykin, Samara State Economic University

PhD-student of the Department of sociology and psychology, Institute of management, Samara State Economic University,

Samara, Russia

References

Бодрийяр Ж. 2017. Симулякры и симуляция. Пер. с франц. М., Постум, 320 с.

Грицанов А.А., Галкин Д.В., Карпенко И.Д. 2003. Виртуальная реальность. Новейший философский словарь. Сост. и гл. науч. ред. А.А. Грицанов. 3-е изд., исправл. М., Книжный Дом: 171–173.

Звоновский В.Б. 2009. Социология пространства повседневности. Самара, Самарский университет, 166 с.

Иванов Д.В. 2002. Виртуализация общества. Версия 2.0. СПб., Петербургское Востоковедение, 217 с.

Рузавин Г.И. 2010. Виртуальность. Новая философская энциклопедия. Электронная книга. URL: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH01b7eff9048db8416a128fb7 (дата обращения: 18 апреля 2020).

Сорокин П.А. 1992. Человек. Цивилизация. Общество. Пер. с англ. М., Политиздат, 543 с.

Урри Дж. 2012. Мобильности. Пер. с англ. М., Праксис, 501 с.

Урри Дж. 2017. Офшоры. Пер. с англ. М., Дело, РАНХиГС, 288 с.

Филиппов А.Ф. 2008. Социология пространства. СПб., Владимир Даль, 285 с.

Филиппов А.Ф. 2001. Социология пространства как теоретическая альтернатива. В кн.: Россия: трансформирующееся общество. М., КАНОН-пресс-Ц, 45–63.

Филиппов А.Ф. 2003. Теоретические основания социологии пространства. Автореф. дис. … докт. соц. наук. М., 40 с.

Харламов Н.А. 2012. Новое общество или новая наука об обществе? Социология мобильностей Джона Урри. М., Праксис, 576 с.

Ходыкин А.В. 2019а. Систематизация трактовок взаимосвязи физического и социального пространств в социологических теориях. В кн.: Будущее социологического знания и вызовы социальных трансформаций (к 90-летию со дня рождения В.А. Ядова). М., ФНИСЦ РАН, 285–290.

Ходыкин А.В. 2019б. Освоение космоса как социологическая проблема. Социологическое обозрение, 4: 47–73. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2019-4-47-73.

Хоружий С.С. 1997. Род или не род? Заметки к онтологии виртуальности. Вопросы философии, 6: 56–74.

Lefebvre H. 1974. La production de l'espace. L'Homme et la soci騁・, 31(1): 15–32.

Urry J. 1999. Automobility, Car Culture and Weightless Travel. Available at: http://www.comp.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/soc008ju.html (accessed 8 February 2020).

Urry J. 2004. The “System” of Automobility. Theory, Culture and Society, 21: 25–39.

Urry J. 2000. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London, Sage, 176 р.

Urry J. 1990. The consumption of tourism. Sociology, 24(1): 23–35.

Urry J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge, Polity Press, 172 р.

Featherstone M., Thrift N., Urry J. 2005. Automobilities. London, Sage, 285 р.


Abstract views: 690

Share

Published

2020-10-09

How to Cite

Khodykin, A. V. (2020). Sociological analysis of the spread of virtual mobility as a form of spatial movement virtualization (based on John Urry’s sociology of mobility). NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 45(3), 579-588. https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-3-579-588

Issue

Section

Thesis