On the Methodological Aspects of Consciousness Research from the Perspective of Post-Synergetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2026-51-3-551-563Keywords:
concepts, methodology of self-development and complexity, transversality, creativity, creative management, cognitive and neurotechnology, topological model of consciousness, color hierarchy of the consciousness process, foci of the topological model of consciousnessAbstract
The authors propose ideas related to the development of a new methodology of consciousness and management of human-dimensional systems based on post-synergetic principles of self-organization of systems initiated in their previous works. A correction of F. Crick and K. Koch’s consciousness research program is explored, related to the transfer of the program into a permanent strategizing process. The paper proposes a new technology for the study of consciousness – C (A & CM), based on the synthesis of system analytics (SA) (analytics 4.0) and system-creative thinking (SCM), which implements the concept of transversality of thinking. Deleuze, E. Guattari and V. Welsh. The concepts of "creativity" and "creative management" are defined from the perspective of the CV hierarchies concept (in the form of a scheme of noncommutative symmetry developed by the authors to study the processes of loss/acquisition of stability by systems). A brief description of the structure-process of consciousness in the form of a color hierarchy is provided as an interaction of cycles of dynamic hierarchies and vortices of foci, representing logical forms of knowledge development. The paper contains a new interpretation of the phenomenon of "qualia" as a result of the natural evolution of information in consciousness. New concepts of "noumenal experience/consciousness" are introduced.
Downloads
References
Список литературы
Аршинов В.И., Буданов В.Г. 2006. Сознание и осознание в синергетике. В кн.: Синергетика на рубеже XX–XXI вв.: 55–73.
Бабинцев В.П., Федотова М.А., Полушин П.В. 2020. Системное управление командной работой на основе гуманитарного развития концепции социального технопакетирования. Вестник Южно-Российского государственного технического университета (НПИ). Серия: Социально-экономические науки, 13(6): 28–38. DOI: 10.17213/2075-2067-2020-6-28-38.
Буданов В.Г. 2010. Управление человекомерными системами и методология синергетики. В кн.: Философия управления: проблемы и стратегии. М., ИФ РАН: 89–112.
Еникеев Л.И. 1999. Общая и социальная психология. М., Норма, Инфра-М, 611 с.
Жюльен Ф. 2025. Невозможная нагота. М., Владивосток, Ад Маргинем Пресс, 149 с.
Морен Э. 2013. Метод. Природа Природы. М., Канон+, 488 с.
Симонов П.В. 1985. О двух разновидностях неосознаваемого психического: под- и сверхсознании. В кн.: Бессознательное. Вып. IV. Тбилиси, Мецниереба: 149–159.
Ревонсуо А. 2013. Психология сознания. СПб., Питер, 336 с.
Саден Э. 2025. Среди призраков: Рассуждение об эпохе метавселенной и генеративного искусственного интеллекта. СПб., Издательство Ивана Лимбаха, 272 с.
Талеб Н.Н. 2014. Антихрупкость. Как извлечь выгоду из хаоса. М., КоЛибри, Азбука-Аттикус, 762 с.
Федотова М.А. 2019. Постнеклассическое стратегирование проблемных ситуаций в концепции соционавигации: переход от целевого управления к атрибутивному конструированию. Экономические стратегии, 21(8(166)): 94–101. DOI: 10.33917/es-8.166.2019.94-101.
Федотова М.А., Шевырев А.В. 2025. Контуры новой методологии мышления и управления: постсинергетический подход (цикло-вихревые иерархии в концепции метаменеджмента). Экономические стратегии, 27(5(203)): 96–103. DOI: 10.33917/es-5.203.2025.96-103.
Федотова М.А., Шевырев А.В. 2021. К вопросу о синтезе когнитивных и нейротехнологий (концепция и инструментарий). Профессиональное образование и рынок труда, 4(47): 88–97. DOI: 10.52944/PORT.2021.47.4.006.
Фэроу М. 2020. Эмергенция субъектности: атрибутирование качеств, феноменальный опыт и существование. МЕТОД: Московский ежегодник трудов из обществоведческих дисциплин, 10: 91–122. DOI: 10.31249/metod/2020.10.04.
Чернавский Д.С. 2002. О методологических аспектах синергетики. В кн.: Синергетическая парадигма. Нелинейное мышление в науке и искусстве. М., Прогресс-Традиция: 50–66.
Шевырев А.В. 2007. Креативный менеджмент: синергетический подход. Белгород, ЛитКараВан, 215 с.
Шевырев А.В., Михеев В.А., Шаламова Н.Г., Федотова М.А. 2016. Системная аналитика в управлении. Введение в научно-исследовательскую программу. Белгород, ЛитКараВан, 384 с.
Шевырев А.В., Федотова М.А., Шевырев В.А. 2025. Проектные и командные технологии как ключевые концепты новой методологии социального управления. Теория и практика общественного развития, 2: 49–61. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2025.2.6.
Emmeche C. 1999. The Biosemiotics of Emergent Properties in a Pluralist Ontology. In: Taborsky E., ed. Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen, Publ. Shaker Verlag: 89–108.
Ferreira M.I.A. 2011. On Meaning: Individuation and Identity – The Definition of a World View. Newcastle upon Tyne, Publ. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 235 p.
Kull K. 2009. Biosemiotics: To Know, What Life Knows. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 16(3–4): 81–88.
Nagel T. 1974. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4): 435–450. DOI: 10.2307/2183914.
Stjernfelt F. 2007. Biosemiotics as Material and Formal Ontology. In: Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht, Publ. Springer: 197–223. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5652-9_9.
Vehkavaara T. 1998. Extended Concept of Knowledge for Evolutionary Epistemology and for Biosemiotics: Hierarchies of Storage and Subject of Knowledge. In: Farré G.L., Oksala T., eds. Emergence, Complexity, Hierarchy, Organization. Espoo, Publ. The Finnish Academy of Technology: 207–216.
References
Arshinov V.I., Budanov V.G. 2006. Soznanie i osoznanie v sinergetike [Consciousness and Awareness in Synergetics]. In: Sinergetika na rubezhe XX–XXI v. [Synergetics at the Turn of the 20th–21st Centuries]: 55–73. (In Russian).
Babintsev V.P., Fedotova M.A., Polushin P.V. 2020. Sistemnoe upravlenie komandnoy rabotoy na osnove gumanitarnogo razvitiya kontseptsii sotsial'nogo tekhnopaketirovaniya [System Management of Teamwork Based on the Humanitarian Development of the Concept of Social Technopackaging]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (NPI). Seriya: Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki, 13(6): 28–38. DOI: 10.17213/2075-2067-2020-6-28-38. (In Russian).
Budanov V.G. 2010. Upravlenie chelovekomernymi sistemami i metodologiya sinergetiki [Management of Human-Dimensional Systems and Methodology of Synergetics]. In: Filosofiya upravleniya: problemy i strategii [Philosophy of Management: Problems and Strategies]. Moscow, Publ. Institute of Philosophy RAS: 89–112. (In Russian).
Enikeev L.I. 1999. Obshchaya i sotsial'naya psikhologiya [General and Social Psychology]. Moscow, Publ. Norma, Infra-M, 611 p. (In Russian).
Jullien F. 2025. Nevozmozhnaya nagota [The Impossible Nude]. Moscow, Vladivostok, Publ. Ad Marginem Press, 149 p. (In Russian).
Morin E. 2013. Metod. Priroda Prirody [Method. The Nature of Nature]. Moscow, Publ. Kanon+, 488 p. (In Russian).
Simonov P.V. 1985. O dvukh raznovidnostyakh neosoznavaemogo psikhicheskogo: pod- i sverkhsoznanii [On Two Varieties of the Unconscious Psyche: Subconsciousness and Superconsciousness]. In: Bessoznatel'noe [The Unconscious]. Issue IV. Tbilisi, Publ. Metsniereba: 149–159. (In Russian).
Revonsuo A. 2013. Psikhologiya soznaniya [Psychology of Consciousness]. St. Petersburg, Publ. Piter, 336 p. (In Russian).
Sadin E. 2025. Sredi prizrakov: Rassuzhdenie ob epokhe metavselennoy i generativnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta [Among the Ghosts: A Discourse on the Era of the Metaverse and Generative Artificial Intelligence]. St. Petersburg, Publ. Ivan Limbakh Publishing House, 272 p. (In Russian).
Taleb N.N. 2014. Antikhrupkost'. Kak izvlech' vygodu iz khaosa [Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder]. Moscow, Publ. KoLibri, Azbuka-Atticus, 762 p. (In Russian).
Fedotova M.A. 2019. Postneklassicheskoe strategirovanie problemnykh situatsiy v kontseptsii sotsionavigatsii: perekhod ot tselevogo upravleniya k atributivnomu konstruirovaniyu [Post-Non-Classical Strategizing of Problem Situations in the Concept of Socionavigation: Transition from Target Management to Attributive Designing]. Economic Strategies, 21(8(166)): 94–101. DOI: 10.33917/es-8.166.2019.94-101. (In Russian).
Fedotova M.A., Shevyrev A.V. 2025. Kontury novoy metodologii myshleniya i upravleniya: postsinergeticheskiy podkhod (tsiklo-vikhrevye ierarkhii v kontseptsii metamenedzhmenta) [Outlines of a New Methodology of Thinking and Management: Post-Synergetic Approach (Cyclic-Vortex Hierarchies in the Concept of Meta-Management)]. Economic Strategies, 27(5(203)): 96–103. DOI: 10.33917/es-5.203.2025.96-103. (In Russian).
Fedotova M.A., Shevyrev A.V. 2021. K voprosu o sinteze kognitivnykh i neyrotekhnologiy (kontseptsiya i instrumentariy) [On the Synthesis of Cognitive and Neurotechnologies (Concept and Tools)]. Vocational Education and Labour Market, 4(47): 88–97. DOI: 10.52944/PORT.2021.47.4.006. (In Russian).
Pharoah M. 2020. Emergentsiya subektnosti: atributirovanie kachestv, fenomenal'nyy opyt i sushchestvovanie [Emergence of Subjectivity: Attribution of Qualities, Phenomenal Experience and Being]. METOD: Moskovskiy ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin, 10: 91–122. DOI: 10.31249/metod/2020.10.04. (In Russian).
Chernavsky D.S. 2002. O metodologicheskikh aspektakh sinergetiki [On Methodological Aspects of Synergetics]. In: Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Nelineynoe myshlenie v nauke i iskusstve [Synergetic Paradigm: Nonlinear Thinking in Science and Art]. Moscow, Publ. Progress-Traditsiya: 50–66. (In Russian).
Shevyrev A.V. 2007. Kreativnyy menedzhment: sinergeticheskiy podkhod [Creative Management:
A Synergetic Approach]. Belgorod, Publ. LitKaraVan, 215 p. (In Russian).
Shevyrev A.V., Mikheev V.A., Shalamova N.G., Fedotova M.A. 2016. Sistemnaya analitika v upravlenii. Vvedenie v nauchno-issledovatel'skuyu programmu [System Analytics in Management: Introduction to the Research Program]. Belgorod, Publ. LitKaraVan, 384 p. (In Russian).
Shevyrev A.V., Fedotova M.A., Shevyrev V.A. 2025. Proektnye i komandnye tekhnologii kak klyuchevye kontsepty novoy metodologii sotsial'nogo upravleniya [Project and Team Technologies as Key Concepts of the New Methodology of Social Management]. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2: 49–61. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2025.2.6. (In Russian).
Emmeche C. 1999. The Biosemiotics of Emergent Properties in a Pluralist Ontology. In: Taborsky E., ed. Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen, Publ. Shaker Verlag: 89–108.
Ferreira M.I.A. 2011. On Meaning: Individuation and Identity – The Definition of a World View. Newcastle upon Tyne, Publ. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 235 p.
Kull K. 2009. Biosemiotics: To Know, What Life Knows. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 16(3–4): 81–88.
Nagel T. 1974. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4): 435–450. DOI: 10.2307/2183914.
Stjernfelt F. 2007. Biosemiotics as Material and Formal Ontology. In: Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht, Publ. Springer: 197–223. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5652-9_9.
Vehkavaara T. 1998. Extended Concept of Knowledge for Evolutionary Epistemology and for Biosemiotics: Hierarchies of Storage and Subject of Knowledge. In: Farré G.L., Oksala T., eds. Emergence, Complexity, Hierarchy, Organization. Espoo, Publ. The Finnish Academy of Technology: 207–216.
Abstract views: 0
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
