Generative Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publications: The Death and Triumph of the Author

Authors

  • Ekaterina G. Tikhomirova National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI
  • Roman V. Dushkin National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2026-51-1-24-34

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, publications, death of the author, Barthes, science ethics, paper mills, anti-plagiarism, semiosphere, dialogism, modular publications, dynamic publications, philosophy of science, authorship, LLM, discourse

Abstract

Contemporary scientific communication is undergoing fundamental transformations under the influence of generative artificial intelligence, challenging traditional models of academic publications. The authors analyse both empirical material and the broader changes occurring in scientific culture through the lens of Roland Barthes' philosophical concept of the «death of the author». The researchers propose an optimistic perspective on the phenomena and paradoxes arising in scientific creativity under the influence of artificial intelligence (AI). Contrary to widespread concerns about the degradation of the academic environment, the analysis demonstrates that the use of large language models in scientific work does not lead to the author 's disappearance, but rather contributes to their efficiency and triumph in new forms. An empirical study of publication practices using various AI models illustrates the ineffectiveness of traditional detection and anti-plagiarism methods. The article presents a substantiated position on the immutability of fundamental ethical principles of science and proposes specific formats for transforming publication practices: modular and dynamic publications, conceptual essays with expert markup. The authors suggest supplementing pre-publication evaluation practices with AI reviewers. The theoretical foundation of the research relies on the semiotic concepts of Yuri Lotman and the dialogism of Mikhail Bakhtin, allowing for the interpretation of AI as a tool for expanding the semiosphere of science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ekaterina G. Tikhomirova, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Ontology and Theory of Cognition, Leading Expert of the Laboratory of Digital Technologies in the Humanities, Center for the Study of Cultural Heritage, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”,
Moscow, Russia
E-mail: EGTikhomirova@mephi.ru

Roman V. Dushkin, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”

CEO of LLC “A-YA Expert”, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Cybernetics No. 22, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”,
Moscow, Russia
E-mail: drv@aia.expert

References

Список литературы

Барт Р. 1989. Смерть автора. В кн.: Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. Сост., общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Г.К. Косикова. М., Прогресс, С. 384-391.

Бахтин М.М. 1979. Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. М., Советский писатель, 504 с.

Сизова Е.В. 2025. Концепты академической этики в условиях цифровой трансформации образования: влияние искусственного интеллекта. Концепт, 7: 324-342.

Floridi L. 2019. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 272 p.

Gao C. 2021. Cultural semiosis and AI: Chinese perspectives. Chinese Journal of Semiotica, 14: 150-168.

Hartgerink C., Field S., van Ravenzwaaij D. 2022. Publishing Research Output Continuously (PROCess): The case of modular publishing. DOI: 10.53962/p7ec-pxxb.

Liverpool L. 2023. AI intensifies fight against 'paper mills' that churn out fake research. Nature, 618: 222-223. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-01780-w. PMID: 37258739.

Sabel B.A. et al. 2023. Paper mills and fake research papers: a global issue threatening scientific integrity. MedRxiv preprint.

Shah J.N., Shah J. 2021. Paper Mills for research writing and publication: A threat to the integrity of science. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, 10: 240-245. DOI: 10.3126/jkmc.v10i4.43865.

Stodden V., Seiler J., Ma Z. 2018. An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11): 2584-2589. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708290115.

Weber-Wulff D., Anohina-Naumeca A., Bjelobaba S., Foltýnek T., Guerrero-Dib J., Popoola O., Šigut P., Waddington L. 2023. Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1): 26. DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.

Zafar L., Masood N. 2020. Impact of Field of Study Trend on Scientific Articles. IEEE Access, 8: 132407-132416. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007558.

Zhang R., Koushanfar F. 2024. Watermarking Large Language Models and the Generated Content: Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv preprint. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.19096.

References

Bart R. 1989. Smert' avtora [The Death of the Author]. In: Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Comp., ed. and introd. by G.K. Kosikov. Moscow, Progress: 384-391.

Bakhtin M.M. 1979. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics]. Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel', 504 p.

Sizova E.V. 2025. Kontsepty akademicheskoi etiki v usloviyakh tsifrovoi transformatsii obrazovaniya: vliyanie iskusstvennogo intellekta [Concepts of Academic Ethics in the Context of Digital Transformation of Education: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence]. Kontsept, (7): 324-342.

Floridi L. 2019. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 272 p.

Gao C. 2021. Cultural semiosis and AI: Chinese perspectives. Chinese Journal of Semiotica, 14(3):

-168.

Hartgerink C., Field S., van Ravenzwaaij D. 2022. Publishing Research Output Continuously (PROCess): The case of modular publishing. DOI: 10.53962/p7ec-pxxb.

Liverpool L. 2023. AI intensifies fight against 'paper mills' that churn out fake research. Nature, 618:

-223. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-01780-w. PMID: 37258739.

Sabel B.A. et al. 2023. Paper mills and fake research papers: a global issue threatening scientific integrity. MedRxiv preprint.

Shah J.N., Shah J. 2021. Paper Mills for research writing and publication: A threat to the integrity of science. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, 10(4): 240-245. DOI: 10.3126/jkmc.v10i4.43865.

Stodden V., Seiler J., Ma Z. 2018. An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11): 2584-2589. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708290115.

Weber-Wulff D., Anohina-Naumeca A., Bjelobaba S., Foltýnek T., Guerrero-Dib J., Popoola O., Šigut P., Waddington L. 2023. Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1): 26. DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.

Zafar L., Masood N. 2020. Impact of Field of Study Trend on Scientific Articles. IEEE Access, 8: 132407-132416. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007558.

Zhang R., Koushanfar F. 2024. Watermarking Large Language Models and the Generated Content: Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv preprint. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.19096.


Abstract views: 0

Share

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Tikhomirova, E. G., & Dushkin, R. V. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publications: The Death and Triumph of the Author. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 51(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2026-51-1-24-34

Issue

Section

Logic, methodology and philosophy of science