Objective Fetishism as a Source of Technocracy and the Illusion of the Exceptionalism of Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2026-51-1-13-23Keywords:
worldview, the inside, fetishism, cyclical nature of the historical process, multifaceted nature of scientific and technological progress (STP), technocracy, objective illusions (delusions), dialectical traditions in Russian philosophy of the 20th centuryAbstract
The purpose of this article is to identify the determinants of technocratic thinking, specifically AI, which is a historical form of technocracy. The real foundation of this illusory consciousness (delusion) is the system of fetishistic social relations at the stage of the next turn of society's " hystory spiral". Here, "deep" historical-dialectical contradictions ("continuity – destruction") and sociocultural dominants arise, leading to the uncritical acceptance of spiritual and scientific innovations as the root causes of historical progress. "Partial" subjects of spiritual labor accept illusory objective fetishes as genuine reality automatically ("by default"). Consequently, they equate reflection with consciousness in essence, and dogmatically identify technology with the root cause of social progress in general, and scientific and technical communication, in particular, with their supernatural "cosmic" exclusivity or mission. The author demonstrates that modern digital technologies (DT) and AI have significant historical significance. However, they are not identical to scientific and technological progress (STP) as a whole, which also includes other priority ("existential") components. The article briefly addresses the historical forms of STP, beginning with the economic and scientific revolution that occurred in England at the end of the 16th century.
Downloads
References
Список литературы
Ильенков Э.В. 1974. Диалектическая логика. М., Политиздат, 273 с.
Лекторский В.А. 1980. Субъект. Объект. Познание. М., Наука, 357 с.
Лобастов Г.В. 2018. Философия как форма сознания. М., Русская панорама. 262 с.
Мареев С.Н. 2011. Мыслить. (Избранные статьи последних лет). М. Изд-во Современного гуманитарного университета, 587 с.
Маркс К. 1960. Капитал. Т. 1. (Сочинения. Изд. 2. Т. 23). М., Политиздат, 797 с.
Поршнев Б.Ф. 1974. О начале человеческой истории (проблемы палеопсихологии). М., Мысль, 487 с.
Резванов С.В. 2011. Философия социальной культуры: природа иллюзорного сознания. М., Ростов-на-Дону, Изд. РГСУ, 335 с.
Резванов С.В. 2013. Философия социальной культуры: генезис, структура, функции и феномены мировоззрения. Ростов-на-Дону, РГСУ, 411 с.
References
Il'enkov E.V. 1974. Dialekticheskaya logika [Dialectical Logic]. Moscow, Politizdat, 273 p.
Lektorskii V.A. 1980. Sub"ekt. Ob"ekt. Poznanie [Subject. Object. Cognition]. Moscow, Nauka, 357 p.
Lobastov G.V. 2018. Filosofiya kak forma soznaniya [Philosophy as a Form of Consciousness]. Moscow, Russkaya panorama, 262 p.
Mareev S.N. 2011. Myslit'. (Izbrannye stat'i poslednikh let) [Thinking. (Selected Articles of Recent Years)]. Moscow, Izd-vo Sovremennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 587 p.
Marks K. 1960. Kapital. T. 1 [Capital. Vol. 1]. (Sochineniya. Izd. 2. T. 23 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 23]). Moscow, Politizdat. 797 p.
Porshnev B.F. 1974. O nachale chelovecheskoi istorii (problemy paleopsikhologii) [On the Beginning of Human History (Problems of Paleopsychology)]. Moscow, Mysl', 487 p.
Rezvanov S.V. 2011. Filosofiya sotsial'noi kul'tury: priroda illyuzornogo soznaniya [Philosophy of Social Culture: The Nature of Illusory Consciousness]. Moscow, Rostov-on-Don, Izd. RGSU, 335 p.
Rezvanov S.V. 2013. Filosofiya sotsial'noi kul'tury: genezis, struktura, funktsii i fenomeny mirovozzreniya [Philosophy of Social Culture: Genesis, Structure, Functions, and Phenomena of Worldview]. Rostov-on-Don., RGSU, 411 p.
Abstract views: 0
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
