Characteristics of Interactive Generative Content as the Main Means of Modern Information Warfares (a Case Study of Literary Anti-Utopias)

Authors

  • Ekaterina N. Vinokurova National Research Tomsk State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2025-50-1-185-195

Keywords:

literary dystopia, social forecasting, interactive generative content, informational content, IGC, artificial intelligence technologies, AI, fifth generation information warfare, digital society, social networks and messengers

Abstract

The aim of the article is to define the characteristics of interactive generative disinformation content (IGC) as the main means of modern information warfare, based on the analysis of literary anti-utopias ("The Penultimate Truth" (F. Dick), "The All-Burnt Offering" (C. Zbeshchovsky), "Rainbows End" (V. Vinge), "Quality Land" (M.-W. Kling), "Fall; or, Dodge in Hell. Book 1" (N. Stevenson), etc.). The methods of the research are socio-philosophical, discursive and conceptual analysis of anti-utopias and projecting the results of this analysis onto modern information warfare practices. The study allowed us to identify and describe the following characteristics of IGC: interactivity, generativity, hyper-personalisation, ideologisation, fake authenticity, high detail, and emotional attractiveness. These results can be used for more effective verification of information circulating in the socio-political network discourse for its reliability and belonging to the disinformation IGC; as well as in the process of educational work with users of social networks and messengers – the main target audiences of modern information warfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ekaterina N. Vinokurova, National Research Tomsk State University

Assistant of the Department of Social Communications, National Research Tomsk State University,
Tomsk, Russia
E-mail: c.vinockurova@yandex.ru

References

Список источников

Виндж В. 2019. Конец радуг. М., Эксмо, Fanzon, 509 с.

Дик Ф. 1993. Предпоследняя истина. Киев, АСК (А.С.К.), 494 с.

Збешховский Ц. 2019. Всесожжение. М., АСТ, 502 с.

Клинг М.-У. 2022. Страна качества 2.0. М., Fanzon, 448 с.

Стивенсон Н. 2020. Падение, или Додж в Аду. Книга первая. М., Эксмо, Fanzon, 544 с.

Asimov I. 1942. Laws of robotics. Astounding Science Fiction, 40 p.

Banks I. 1996. Excession. Orbit Books, 451 p.

Butler S. 1872. Erewhon. Trübner and Ballantyne, 246 p.

MacDonald I. 2004. River of Gods. Simon & Schuster, 485 p.

Meyer M. 2012. Cinder. Feiwel & Friends, 390 p.

Sheckley R. 1953. Watchbird. Galaxy Science Fiction, 40 p.

Shelley M. 1818. Frankenstein; or The Modern Prometheus. Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones, 280 p.

Wells H. 1895. The Time Machine. William Heinemann, 84 p.

William G. 1890. The Wreck of a World. London, Digby and Long, 180 p.

Williamson J. 1949. The Humanoids. Simon and Schuster, 239 p.

Список литературы

Бодрийяр Ж. 2016. Дух терроризма. Войны в заливе не было. М., РИПОЛ классик, 224 с.

Бурдье П. 1994. Начала. М., Socio-Logos, 288 с.

Бурдье П. 2005. О символической власти. М., Центр гуманитарных технологий, 576 с.

Бурдье П. 2007. Воспроизводство: элементы теории системы образования. М., Просвещение, 265 с.

Данилов Ю.Д. 2019. Человек цифровой эпохи: сценарии будущего. Экономист, 5: 29–37.

Земнухова Л.В. 2020. Приключения технологий: барьеры цифровизации в России. М., ФНИСЦ РАН, 100 c.

Золотухина-Аболина Е.В., Ингерлейб М.Б. 2021. Образ «светлого будущего»: проблема социокультурных стратегий. Вестник Московского государственного университета культуры, 99(1): 6–15.

Костенкова В.В. 2019. Антиутопия начала XXI века в динамике жанровых трансформаций: дис. ... канд. филол. наук: 10.01.01. Краснодар, 180 с.

Кужелева-Саган И.П. 2023. Концепции П. Бурдье, Ж. Лакана и Р. Познера как основания для понимания механизмов современных информационных войн. Коммуникология, 11(3): 42–62.

Маркузе Г. 1994. Одномерный человек. М., REFL-book, 368 с.

Соколов Ю.И. 2021. Риски человека в цифровую эпоху. Проблемы анализа риска, 18(2): 72–87.

Филатов В.И. 2014. Антиутопия ХХ века как метод предвидения будущего. Вестник Омского университета, 74(4): 84–86.

Beck U. 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge, Polity Press, 269 p.

Berry D. 2014. Critical Theory and the Digital. Bloomsbury Publishing, 273 p.

Hartmann J., Schwenzow J., Witte M. The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation. 2023. ChatGPT’s Political Ideology: 1–7.

References

Baudrillard J. 2016. Duh terrorizma. Vojny v zalive ne bylo [The Spirit Terrorism. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place]. Moscow, Publ. RIPOL klassik, 224 p.

Berry D. 2014. Critical Theory and the Digital. Bloomsbury Publishing, 273 p.

Bourdieu P. 1994. Nachala [Beginnings]. Moscow, Publ. Socio-Logos, 288 p.

Bourdieu P. 2005. O simvolicheskoj vlasti [Symbolic Power]. Moscow, Centr gumanitarnyh tekhnologij, 576 p.

Bourdieu P. 2007. Vosproizvodstvo: elementy teorii sistemy obrazovaniya [Reproduction: Elements of the Theory of the System of Education]. Moscow, Publ. Prosveshchenie, 265 p.

Danilov YU.D. 2019. Digital man: scenarios for the future. Ekonomist, 5: 29–37 (in Russian).

Dick F. 1993. Predposlednyaya istina [The Penultimate Truth]. Kiev, Publ. ASK (A.S.K.), 494 p.

Filatov V.I. 2014. Antiutopiya XX veka kak metod predvideniya budushchego [Anti-utopia of the XX century as a method of forecasting the future]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 74(4): 84–86 (in Russian).

Hartmann J., Schwenzow J., Witte M. 2023. The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation. ChatGPT’s Political Ideology: 1–7.

Kling M.-U. 2022. Strana kachestva 2.0 [QualityLand 2.0.]. Moscow, Publ. Fanzon, 448 p.

Kostenkova V.V. 2019. Antiutopiya nachala XXI veka v dinamike zhanrovyh transformacij [Early twenty-first century anti-utopia in the dynamics of genre transformations]: dis. ... Candidate of Philological Sciences: 10.01.01. Krasnodar, 180 p. (in Russian).

Kuzheleva-Sagan I. P. 2023. Pierre Bourdieu’s, Jacques Lacan’s and Roland Posner’s Concepts as the Basis for Explaining the Mechanisms of Information Warfare. Kommunikologiya, 11(3): 42–62 (in Russian).

MacDonald I. 2004. River of Gods. Simon & Schuster, 485 p.

Marcuse G. 1994. Odnomernyj chelovek [One-Dimensional Man]. Moscow, Publ. REFL-book, 368 p.

Sokolov YU.I. 2021. Human Risks in the Digital Age. Problemy analiza riska, 18(2): 72–87. (in Russian)

Zemnuhova L.V. 2020. Priklyucheniya tekhnologij: bar'ery cifrovizacii v Rossii [The Adventures of Technology: Barriers to Digitalisation in Russia]. Moscow, Publ. FNISC RAN, 100 p. (in Russian)

Zolotukhina-Abolina E.V., Ingerleyb M.B. 2021. The image of a “bright future”: the problem of sociocultural strategies. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury, 99(1): 6–15 (in Russian).


Abstract views: 3

Share

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Vinokurova, E. N. (2025). Characteristics of Interactive Generative Content as the Main Means of Modern Information Warfares (a Case Study of Literary Anti-Utopias). NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 50(1), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2025-50-1-185-195

Issue

Section

Cultural studies and philosophy of art