The Impact of Digitalization on the Formation of Religious Identity in Modern Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2025-50-1-172-184Keywords:
modern society, man, the beginning of the 21st century, religious identity, religion, digitalization, digital religion, social networks, internet, technologyAbstract
Digital technologies have transformed human life, requiring people to acquire new skills and competencies. These technologies have also impacted religious life by transforming the processes of forming religious identity into a digital format. However, there are still no clear answers about the impact of digitization on the formation of religious identity or its potential negative consequences. The goal of this study is to actualize all positive and negative effects of digitization on the formation of modern society's religious identity. The concepts of identity, religious identity, and digitization are explained. Processes of forming religious identity in the pre-digital era are described, along with changes brought about by digitization. The research identified both positive and negative aspects, the former consisting in quick access to all religious materials, digital communication with clergy and religious communities, and the latter including increased conflict between supporters and opponents of digitization, simplification of religious norms, reduced personal connection and interaction among believers, data privacy issues when participating online in rituals, spread of destructive and extremist materials aimed at mass recruitment and destruction of traditional confessions. Attention was focused on mechanisms to counteract these negative sides of digitization. The authors conclude that all negative aspects of digitization may be minimized through digital education, clergy’s clear stance regarding digital technologies, and countering religious destructiveness in the digital space.
Downloads
References
Список литературы
Бион У. 2009. Элементы психоанализа. М., Когито-Центр, 127 с.
Бион У. 2017. Научение через опыт переживания. М., Когито-Центр, 218 с.
Брентано Ф. 1996. Психология с эмпирической точки зрения. Избранные работы. М.: Дом интеллектуальной книги, Русское феноменологическое общество. С. 10-91.
Винникот Д.В. 2017. Игра и реальность. М., Институт общегуманитарных исследований, 208 с.
Гадамер Х.Г. 1988. Истина и метод: Основы философской герменевтики. М., Прогресс, 704 с.
Гуссерль Э. 2005a. Картезианские медитации. Избранные работы. М., Издательский дом «Территория будущего», С. 377-442.
Гуссерль Э. 2005b. Феноменологическая психология. Избранные работы. М., Издательский дом «Территория будущего», С. 297-340.
Левинас Э. 1998. Время и другой. Гуманизм другого человека. Спб., Высшая религиозно-философская школа, 264 с.
Мерло-Понти М. 2001. Знаки. М., Искусство, 429 с.
Мерло-Понти М. 2006. Видимое и невидимое. М., Логвинов, 400 с.
Фрейд З. 1991. Массовая психология и анализ человеческого Я. Фрейд З. Труды разных лет. Кн.1. Тбилиси, Мерани, С. 71–138.
Фрейд З. 2013. Недовольство культурой. М., Фолио, 224 с.
Фрейд З. 2014. Я и Оно. М., Эксмо, 864 с.
Хайдеггер М. 2015. Бытие и время. М., Академический проект, 460 с.
Binswanger L. 1993. Grundformen und Erkennhis menschlichen Daseins. Binswanger L. Ausgewählte Werke: in 4 Bänden. Bd. 2. Heidelberg, Asanger, S. 13–639.
Brown L.J. 2011. Intersubjective Processes and the Unconscious. An Integration of Freudian, Kleinian and Bionian Perspectives. London, New York, Routledge, 267 p.
Civitarese G. 2021. Intersubjectivity and analytic field theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 69(5):853-893. DOI: 10.1177/00030651211044788
Ulijee R. 2023. The unconscious and the transcendental: Husserlian phenomenology in intersubjective systems theory. Frontiers in Psychology, Nov: 1-10.
Stolorow R.D. 2011. World, affectivity, trauma: Heidegger and post-Cartesian psychoanalysis. New York, Routledge, 121 p.
Stolorow R.D., Atwood G.E. 2019. The power of phenomenology: psychoanalytic and philosophical perspectives. New York, Routledge, 152 p.
References
Bion U. 2009. Elementy psikhoanaliza [Elements of psychoanalysis]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 127 p. (Bion W.R. 1963. Elements of Psychoanalysis. William Heinemann, 116 p.)
Bion U. 2017. Nauchenie cherez opyt perezhivaniya [Learning from Expirience]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 218 p. (Bion W.R. 1962. Learning from Expirience. William Heinemann, 123 p.)
Brentano F. 1996. Psikhologiya s empiricheskoii tochki zreniya [Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint]. Izbrannye raboty. M., Dom intellektual'noi knigi, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo: 10-91. (Brentano F. 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte. Verlag von Duncker&Humbolt, 379 p.)
Vinnikot D.V. 2017. Igra i real'nost' [Playing and reality]. Moscow, Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovanii, 208 p. (Winnicott D.W. 1971. Playing and reality. Tavistock Publications, 151 p.)
Gadamer H.G. 1988. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki [Truth and method]. Moscow, Progress, 704 p. (Gadamer H. G. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode.Mohr, 512 p.)
Gusserl' E. 2005a. Kartezianskie meditatsii [Cartesian Meditations]. Izbrannye raboty. Moscow, Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego»: 377-442. (Husserl E. 1986. Méditations cartésiennes, trad. E. Lévinas et G. Pfeiffer, Vrin, Nouv. Ed. J.Vrin, 136 p.)
Gusserl' E. 2005b. Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya [Phenomenological Psychology]. Izbrannye raboty. Moscow, Izdatel'skij dom «Territoriya budushchego»: 297-340. (Husserl E. 2003. Phänomenologische Psychologie. Hrsg. v. Dieter Lohmar. Meiner, 286 p.)
Levinas E. 1998. Vremya i drugoi. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka [Time and the Other]. Saint Petersburg, Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 264 p. (Levinas E. 1983. Le temps et l'autre. PUF, 578 p.)
Merlo-Ponti M. 2001. Znaki [Signs]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 429 p. (Merleau_Ponty M. 1960. Signes. NRF, Gallimard, 343 p.)
Merlo-Ponti M. 2006. Vidimoe i nevidimoe [The visible and the invisible]. Moscow, Logvinov, 400 p. (Merleau_Ponty M. 1964. Le Visible et l’invisible. Cl. Lefort, Gallimard, 361 p.)
Freid Z. 1991. Massovaya psihologiya i analiz chelovecheskogo Ya [Group psychology and the analisys of Ego]. Freid Z. Trudy raznyh let. Kn.1. Tbilisi, Merani: 71–138. (Freud S. 1921 Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 154 p.)
Freid Z. 2013. Nedovol'stvo kul'turoi [Culture and its discontents]. Moscow, Folio, 224 p. (Freud S. 1930 Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 136 p.)
Freid Z. 2014. Ya i Ono. [The Ego and The Id]. Moscow, Eksmo, 864 p. (Freud S. 1923 Das Ich und das Es. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 83 p.)
Khajdegger M. 2015. Bytie i vremja [Being and Time]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt, 460 p. (Heidegger M. 1972. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, M. Niemeyer, 437 p.)
Binswanger L. 1993. Grundformen und Erkennhis menschlichen Daseins. [Basic forms and knowledge of human existence]. Binswanger L. Ausgewählte Werke: in 4 Bänden. Bd. 2. Heidelberg, Asanger: 13–639.
Brown L.J. [Intersubjective Processes and the Unconscious. An Integration of Freudian, Kleinian and Bionian Perspectives]. 2011. London, New York, Routledge, 267 p.
Civitarese G. 2021. Intersubjectivity and analytic field theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 69(5): 853-893. DOI: 10.1177/00030651211044788
Ulijee R. 2023. The unconscious and the transcendental: Husserlian phenomenology in intersubjective systems theory. Frontiers in Psychology, Nov: 1-10.
Stolorow R.D. [World, affectivity, trauma: Heidegger and post-Cartesian psychoanalysis]. 2011. New York, Routledge, 121 p.
Stolorow R.D., Atwood G.E. [The power of phenomenology: psychoanalytic and philosophical perspectives]. 2019. New York, Routledge, 152 p.
Abstract views: 6
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.