Contemporary Anglo-American Legal Positivism: Chronology and Topical Themes of Scientific Discourse

Authors

  • Maksim D. Gorbunov Lobachevsky Novgorod State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-2-254-262

Keywords:

Anglo-American legal thought, common law family, legal understanding, legal positivism, normative regulation, legal philosophy, legal axiology, social facts

Abstract

The question of perfecting the methodology and modernization of the positivist doctrine is highly relevant in the domestic legal theory. In this context, the analysis of the provisions of the legal dogma of competing legal systems, in particular the Anglo-American legal positivism, its subject area and the history of its formation, is of great importance. The author points out that the foundations of this direction were formulated in the scientific works of Herbert Hart, who identified the topical issues of modern theory. It is a widespread point of view that it is precisely with his legal theory that the modern stage of the development of this direction begins. In turn, the more objective consideration of the question demonstrates a certain degree of inaccuracy in this conclusion. The named circumstances made it necessary to define the chronological and subject frameworks of the modern Anglo-American positivism as a direction in the understanding of the law for the subsequent perspective of comparative studies. As a result, the author defines the following topical themes of modern Anglo-American positivism: the understanding of law as a social fact, the conventional nature of legal normativity, the limitation of the formal expression of norms in legislation, the rational conditioning of following legal norms, and axiological openness. As a result, the research established that disagreements among the representatives of the direction on the last question determined the formation of two vectors of the development of Anglo-American legal positivism in our days. Precisely their emergence determines the chronological and subject frames of modern Anglo-American legal positivism.

Author Biography

Maksim D. Gorbunov, Lobachevsky Novgorod State University

Candidate of Law Science, Senior Lecturer, Department of History of State and Law, Lobachevsky Novgorod State University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.

References

Золкин A.Л. 2005. Эволюция лингвистической доктрины аналитической философии и аналитическая школа права. История государства и права, 2: 52-56.

Касаткин С.Н. 2012. Юридический позитивизм в англо-американской правовой мысли. Концепция Герберта Харта. В кн.: Юридический позитивизм и конкуренция теорий права: история и современность к 100-летию со дня смерти Г.Ф. Шершеневича: Материалы VI Международной научно-практической конференции (Иваново, 05–08 октября 2012 года). Часть 1. Иваново, Ивановский государственный университет: 298-320.

Касаткин С.Н. 2018. Проблема судейского усмотрения в полемике Г. Харта и Р. Дворкина: очерк основных позиций. Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Юридические науки, 4: 21-27

Краевский А.А. 2015. Чистое учение о праве Ганса Кельзена и современный юридический позитивизм. Правоведение, 2(319): 88-125

Макаренко В.П. 2002. Аналитическая философия права: концепции и проблемы. Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение, 6: 10-33.

Пищулин А.В. 2010. Современный юридический позитивизм в англосаксонской правовой семье. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 11. Право, 4: 98-107.

Суровцев В.А. 2005. О методах аналитической философии. В кн.: Аналитическая философия: проблемы и перспективы развития в России. СПб., Изд-во философ.фак. СПбГУ: 74-80.

Bingham T.H. 2007. The Rule of Law. The Cambridge Law Journal, 1 (66): 67-85.

Bix B. 2009. On Philosophy in American Law: Analytical Legal Philosophy. In: On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge, Publ. Cambridge University Press: 99-105.

Blichner L. 2008. Juridification from Below. The Dynamics of MacCormick’s Institutional Theory of Law. In: The post-sovereign constellation, Law and politics in Neil MacCormick's theory of law. Oslo, Publ. ARENA: 37-72.

Coleman J. 2003. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. New York, Publ. Oxford University Press, 248 p.

Detmold M. J. 1984. The Unity of Law and Morality: A Refutation of Legal Positivism. London, Publ. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 264 p.

Dworkin R. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge. Mass, Publ. The Belknap Press, 470 p.

Finnis, J. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, Publ. Oxford University Press, 442 p.

Fuller L. 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 4(71): 630-672.

Hart H.L.A. 1957. Analytical Jurisprudence in Mid-twentieth Century: A Reply to Professor Bodenheimer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 105: 953-975.

Lyons D. 1984. Ethics and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, Publ. Cambridge University Press, 240 p.

MacCormick N. 2007. Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford, Publ. Oxford University Press, 317 p.

Marmor A. 2001. Positive Law and Objective Values. New York, Publ. Clarendon Press, 200 p.

Raz J. 2001. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. New York, Publ. Oxford University Press, 380 p.

Raz J. 1990. Authority. New York, Publ. NY University Press, 336 p.

Shapiro S. 2011. Legality. Cambridge, Mass, Publ. The Belknap Press, 472 p.

Waluchow W. 2001. Legal Positivism, Inclusive versus Exclusive in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/legal-positivism-inclusive-versus-exclusive/v-1 (дата обращения: 14.03.2024).

Waluchow W. 1994. Inclusive Legal Positivism, Oxford, Publ. Clarendon Press, 300 p.


Abstract views: 13

Share

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Gorbunov, M. D. (2024). Contemporary Anglo-American Legal Positivism: Chronology and Topical Themes of Scientific Discourse. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 49(2), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-2-254-262

Issue

Section

Theoretical and historical legal sciences