The Concept of Simple Legal Language as the Main Vector in the Development of Legal Technology in Anglo-Saxon Countries

Authors

  • Dmitriy A. Volkov Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-63-70

Keywords:

legal technology, legal terminology, rules of law, legal and technical techniques, simple language

Abstract

Modern development of society leads to the constant complication of social relations, which, in turn, stimulates the legislative processes taking place in the state. The resulting significant increase in the legislative  array brings to the agenda the issue of its optimization, the main tool of which is legal technology. Scientific research in this area conducted by Russian scientists, most often, is strictly focused on the interests of the Russian legislator and accumulates developed traditions and established technical and legal approaches. Meanwhile, studying foreign experience from the standpoint of assessing the effectiveness of installations tested in other conditions could significantly enrich this area. One of the fundamentally new technical and legal approaches to the design of legislation is the concept of simple legal language, formed in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family, the study of which has received very little attention in the Russian literature. The article touches on the formation and development of the concept of simple legal English and its influence on the legislative activity of countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family. It is noted that criticism of the legal language for its complexity and ambiguity by the scientific community and publicists led in the middle of the last century to the formation of a scientific movement that aimed to improve legal technology by developing techniques and methods for presenting text that simplify its perception by the user. The practical implementation of recommendations developed by the scientific community, formed by scientists at the intersection of linguistics and jurisprudence, has led to positive results. Initially published as recommendations, manuals on the preparation of legal texts were subsequently transformed into methodological recommendations and ultimately led to the re-drafting of the legislation of some countries, as well as to the realization of the need to normatively consolidate the developed techniques of simple legal English in the law. The author concludes that the concept of simple legal language is one of the most popular modern vectors for the development of legal technology used in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family. The conclusion is drawn: the concept of simple legal language is currently a scientific approach to the improvement of legal technology, which has received its practical application in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family.

Author Biography

Dmitriy A. Volkov, Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Lecturer of the Forensics Department, Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia

References

Артебякина Н.А. 2012. К вопросу о некоторых нарушениях приемов правотворческой техники в гражданском процессуальном законодательстве (на примере главы 22.1 ГПК РФ). Арбитражный и гражданский процесс, 4: 46–47.

Желдыбина Т.А. 2016. Вопросы законодательной техники в процессе кодификации права. Российская юстиция, 4: 6–9.

Звенигородская Н.Ф. 2009. Проблемы терминологии в механизме защиты семейных прав. Семейное и жилищное право, 4: 31–35.

Зорькин В.Д. 2013. Право в условиях глобальных перемен. М., Норма, 495 с.

Кудряшова Е.В. 2006. Бюджетная реформа и совершенствование юридической техники бюджетного законодательства. Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 8: 38–40.

Никифорова Н.Н. 2021. Проблема определения круга объектов жилищных прав в Жилищном кодексе Российской Федерации. Семейное и жилищное право, 3: 41–44. DOI: 10.18572/1999-477X-2021-3-41-44.

Рахманина Т.Н. 2008. Актуальные вопросы кодификации российского законодательства. Журнал российского права, 4: 30–31.

Формакидов Д.А. 2022. О проблемах юридической техники в правовом регулировании статуса членов семьи нанимателя жилого помещения. Семейное и жилищное право, 5: 45–48. DOI: 10.18572/1999-477X-2022-5-45-48.

Чиркин В.Е. 2017. О точности использования термина «конституционное большинство» (частные заметки). Конституционное и муниципальное право, 1: 24–26.

Gowers Е. 1954. The Complete Plain Words. London., 209 p.

Martineau R.J. 1991. Drafting Legislation and Rules in Plain English. St. Paul., West Pub. Co., 155 p.

Mellinkoff D. 1963. The Language of the Law. Boston., Little, Brown and Company, 526 p.

Sullivan R. 2001. The Promise of Plain Language Drafting. McGill Law Journal, 47: 97–128.

Wydick R.C. 2005. Plain English for Lawyers. Durham., Carolina Academic Press. 139 p.

Zariski A.M. 2014. Legal Literacy An Introduction to Legal Studies. Athabasca., Athabasca University, 206 p.


Abstract views: 42

Share

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Volkov, D. A. (2024). The Concept of Simple Legal Language as the Main Vector in the Development of Legal Technology in Anglo-Saxon Countries. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 49(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-63-70

Issue

Section

Theoretical and historical legal sciences