The Modern Reception of M.M. Bakhtin’s Methodology in the Social Sciences of the Human
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2023-48-3-423-433Keywords:
Bakhtinology, dialogism, Gender Studies, Psychotherapy, Social Studies, Political StudiesAbstract
Within the framework of modern social research about man (Social Studies), the reception of M. Bakhtin's ideas seems to be a fruitful field for the search for new solutions in various applied disciplines. Methodologically, M. Bakhtin's developments are perceived in the modern world tradition as part of the disciplinary field of "Social Studies" to a greater extent than "Arts and Humanities". We will try to consider in which of the most significant areas of social knowledge about a person abroad the Bakhtin reception appears these days. The research methodology is based on various comparative approaches, reconstruction of traditional and modern contexts and continuity of ideas. The results obtained demonstrate that one of the distinctive features of Western reception is the practice of translating the Bakhtin methodology from the field of pure humanities to the field of empirical sciences, in particular in the field of gender studies, social, psychological and political sciences. The innovative perspective of the research allowed us to show that the formation of the body of Bakhtin's ideas in the English-speaking research environment occurred not so much due to a comprehensive consideration of his legacy, as due to the original interpretation of selected plots and conceptualizations of Bakhtin's thought for the purpose of application in the field of field research in the field of social sciences.
Funding: research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant No. 19-18-00100, https://rscf.ru/project/19-18-00100/
Downloads
References
Bell M., Gardiner M.E. 1998. Bakhtin and the human sciences: No last words. London, Publ. SAGE, 235 p.
Bernard-Donals M. 1995a. Bakhtin and social change, or Why no one’s Bakhtin is politically revolutionary (A history play in four acts). The Centennial Review, 39(3): 429–444.
Bernard-Donals M.F. 1995b. Mikhail Bakhtin: Between phenomenology and Marxism. Cambridge University Press, 187 p.
Creaton J. 2015. Marking the boundaries: Knowledge and identity in professional doctorates. Fort Collins, Colorado. Publ. The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. DOI: 10.37514/PER-B.2015.0674.2.16
Ellis J.N. 2020. The Psyche and Gender as a Multiplicity. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6976. URL: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6976 (Accessed: July 15, 2023).
Francis B., Paechter C. 2015. The problem of gender categorisation: addressing dilemmas past and present in gender and education research. Gender and Education, 27: 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1092503
Jung H.Y. 1990. Mikhail Bakhtin’s body politic: A phenomenological dialogics. Man and World, 23: 85–99.
Irigaray L. To Be Two. London: Taylor and Francis, 2017. DOI: 10.4324/9781315084732
Larrabee M., Weine S., Woolcott P. 2003. “The wordless nothing”: Narratives of trauma and extremity. Human Studies, 26: 353–382.
Leiman M. 2011. Mikhail Bakhtin’s contribution to psychotherapy research. Culture & Psychology, 17: 441–461. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X11418543
Mehl-Madrona L., Pennycook G. 2009. Construction of an aboriginal theory of mind and mental health. Anthropology of Consciousness, 20: 85–100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-3537.2009.01017.x
Roderick I. 1995. The politics of Mikhail M. Bakhtin’s carni-phallic body. Social Semiotics, 5(1): 119–142. DOI: 10.1080/10350339509384444
Abstract views: 97
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
