Russian Society's Trust and Distrust to the Institution of Healthcare: Social Indicators and Post-pandemic Effects

Authors

  • Nikita A. Vyalykh Southern Federal University
  • Anna A. Bespalova Southern Federal University
  • Vadim Z. Zarbaliev Southern Federal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2023-48-3-458-470

Keywords:

social trust, institution of healthcare, COVID-19 pandemic, consumers of medical care, medical choice, Russian society

Abstract

The topicality of the article stems from the necessity for a sociological interpretation and measurement of public confidence in the institution of healthcare in terms of changes, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic during the last years. The disadvantage of most studies of trust/distrust, regardless of the scientific field, is the confidence in a generally accepted concept of trust. Therefore, most sociological diagnostics are usually reduced to identifying some kinds of indices and averages of trust, satisfaction, and expectations of medical care consumers. In this regard, the purpose of the research is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of social perceptions, practices, behavioral attitudes that form a system of indicators of public confidence in the institution of healthcare. The structure of trust/distrust of Russian society towards healthcare at the stage of normalization of the epidemiological situation is shown based on the materials of an interregional questionnaire survey conducted by the team of contributors, as well as on the basis of secondary sociological data. The results lead to a paradoxical conclusion that generalized confidence in medical organizations has largely declarative and flexible nature and it is often unfocused for the patients and pre-patients. In real life situations requiring adequate therapeutic choice, medical care consumers demonstrate a fairly high degree of personal responsibility, moderately risky strategies of medical activity, an average level of compliance and a desire to receive medical care outside the region of permanent residence. In addition, trust is differentiated by the criteria of social capital, since it depends on having the familiar health workers, personal, family doctors. At the same time, trust/distrust towards healthcare is just an ideological and theoretical construct, an intuitive dynamic matrix. Due to this matrix an individual complex of adaptive self–preservation reactions is reproduced for each person, leading to both positive and undesirable effects.

 

Funding: The study was carried out as part of the implementation of the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for state support of young Russian scientists – candidates of sciences (MK-1818.2022.2) "Dynamics of social trust of the Russian society in the healthcare institution in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic".

Author Biographies

Nikita A. Vyalykh, Southern Federal University

Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Institute of Sociology and Regional Studies, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. 

Anna A. Bespalova, Southern Federal University

Candidate of Sociological Sciences, senior lecturer, Institute of Sociology and Regional Studies, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

Vadim Z. Zarbaliev, Southern Federal University

postgraduate student, Institute of Sociology and Regional Studies, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

References

Баранова Е.А. 2022. Институциональное доверие как ключевой фактор в реакции общества на пандемию. Russian Economic Bulletin, 5(4): 272–275.

Бергер П., Лукман Т. 1995. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М., Медиум, 323 с.

Вялых Н.А. 2022. Феномен социального (не)доверия российского общества к институту здравоохранения в контексте пандемии COVID-19: когнитивные иллюзии и методологические проблемы. Вестник НГУЭУ, 2: 178–193. DOI 10.34020/2073-6495-2022-2-178-193.

Вялых Н.А., Беспалова А.А., Зарбалиев В.З. 2022. Факторы и проблемы социологического измерения доверия российского общества к системе здравоохранения в период пандемии COVID-19. Векторы благополучия: экономика и социум, 1(44): 129–144. DOI 10.18799/26584956/2022/1/1150.

Вялых Н.А., Беспалова А.А., Зарбалиев В.З. 2023. Социальное доверие и недоверие в сфере российского здравоохранения в период пандемии COVID-19: теоретико-методологические подходы и источники негативизации. Caucasian Science Bridge, 3(17): 12–20. DOI 10.18522/2658-5820.2022.3.1.

Глушко И.В., Зуева Т.М. 2018. Доверие как ресурс изменения социальных практик и институтов современного российского общества. Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль, 10(2-2): 72–77. DOI 10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-2/2-72-77.

Крестьянинова О.Г. 2019. Медицинский туризм: сущность и перспективы развития. Технико-технологические проблемы сервиса, 3(49): 66–69.

Лядова А.В. 2021. Социальные факторы здоровья в условиях пандемии новой коронавирусной инфекции. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология, 27(4): 134–156. DOI 10.24290/1029-3736-2021-27-4-134-156.

Макушева М.О., Нестик Т.А. 2020. Социально-психологические предпосылки и эффекты доверия социальным институтам в условиях пандемии. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 6: 427–447. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1770.

Сачкова М.Е., Семенова Л.Э. 2022. Образ врача и доверие к себе и другим у студентов в период пандемии COVID-19. Вестник психотерапии, 83(88): 49–61. DOI 10.25016/2782-652X-2022-0-83-49-6.

Тартаковская И.Н. 2021. Доверие перед лицом пандемии: в поисках точки опоры. Социологический журнал, 27(2): 68–89. DOI 10.19181/socjour.2021.27.2.8087.

Трапезникова Д.С., Гордеева С.С. 2022. Социальное конструирование здоровья и болезни. Социальные и гуманитарные науки: теория и практика, 1(6): 117–124.

Умерова А.Р., Каштанова О.А., Новосельцева Т.В. 2010. Некоторые аспекты самолечения. Астраханский медицинский журнал, 5(1): 123–127.

Федотова В.Г. 2021. Пандемия COVID-19 в 2021 году: проблемы доверия. Знание. Понимание. Умение, 4. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2021.4.9.

Финкельштейн И.Е. 2021. Правила принятия терапевтических решений хроническими больными. Laboratorium: журнал социальных исследований, 13(2): 267–291. DOI 10.25285/2078-1938-2021-13-2-267-291.

Финкельштейн И.Е. 2022. Культурные (медицинские) представления хронических больных в период пандемии COVID-19: механизмы работы и формирования культурного знания в ситуации неопределенности. Семиотические исследования, 2(3): 110–118. DOI 10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-3-110-118.

Шакирова А.Ф., Селянцева А.А. 2022. Изучение уровня комплаентности у амбулаторных пациентов. Архитектура здоровья, 1: 42–46.

Banerjee S., Nath S.S., Dey N., Eto H, 2015. Global Medical Tourism: A Review. In: New Business Opportunities in the Growing E-Tourism Industry. IGI Global, 114–131. DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-8577-2.ch007.

Belfrage S., Helgesson G., Lynøe N. 2022. Trust and digital privacy in healthcare: a cross-sectional descriptive study of trust and attitudes towards uses of electronic health data among the general public in Sweden. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(19). DOI 10.1186/s12910-022-00758-z.

Bourdieu P. 1986. The Forms of Capital / trans. Richard Nice, chapter 9 in John G. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press: Westport, CN, 241–258.

Hong Z., Deng Z., Zhang W. 2019. Examining factors affecting patients trust in online healthcare services in China: the moderating role of the purpose of use. Health Informatics Journal, 25(4): 1647–1660.

Jabeen F., Hamid Z., Akhunzada A., Abdul W., Ghouzali S. 2018. Trust and reputation management in healthcare systems: taxonomy, requirements and open issues. IEEE Access, 6: 17246–17263.

Lee S. 2022. Subjective well-being and mental health during the pandemic outbreak: exploring the role of institutional trust. Research on Aging, 44(1): 10–21.


Abstract views: 57

Share

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Vyalykh, N. A., Bespalova, A. A., & Zarbaliev, V. Z. (2023). Russian Society’s Trust and Distrust to the Institution of Healthcare: Social Indicators and Post-pandemic Effects. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 48(3), 458-470. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2023-48-3-458-470

Issue

Section

Sociology, social structures and processes, social technologies