In Place of Postmodernity: A Review of New Concepts of the State of Culture and Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2022-47-3-474-482Keywords:
social philosophy, post-postmodernism, metamodernism, hypermodernism, transmodernism, automodernism, digimodernism, cosmomodernism, performatism, neomodernismAbstract
The question of what sociocultural paradigm has replaced postmodernism is being actively studied by philosophers and culturologists today. Due to the fact that the works of Western authors on this topic have been little studied and not translated into Russian, Russian humanitarian thought is not enriched with new interpretations of the current state of culture, remaining in an indefinite relationship to the end of postmodernity. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the fact of the end of the postmodern era and supplement the languages of description of the modern era with the help of a review of modern concepts of the state of culture and society. In the course of the work, a collection and analysis of the latest concepts that describe the conditional term "post-postmodern" was carried out. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the presented concepts focus on the changes that have occurred with modern society over the past 20 years. The results of the study complement the language of description of the new socio-cultural paradigm for all those involved in research in the field of social philosophy, cultural studies and sociology.
References
Аккер Р., ван ден, 2020. Метамодернизм. Историчность, аффект и глубина после постмодернизма. Пер. с англ., В.М. Липка. М., РИПОЛ классик, 342 с. (Metamodernism: historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Group, Lanham, MD, USA, 260 p.).
Akker R., van den 2020. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. М., RIPOL klassik, 342. (in Russian). (Metamodernism: historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Group, Lanham, MD, USA, 260 p.).
Оже М. Не-места. 2017. Введение в антропологию гипермодерна. Пер. с франц., Коннов А.Ю. М., Новое литературное обозрение, 136 с. (Non-lieux. Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Seuil, coll. «La librairie du xxe siècle», 1992? 160 p.).
Ozhe M. Ne-mesta. 2017. Vvedenie v antropologiju gipermoderna [An Introduction to Hypermodern Anthropology] M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 136 p. (in Russian). (Non-lieux. Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Seuil, coll. «La librairie du xxe siècle», 1992? 160 p.).
Павлов А.В. 2019. Постпостмодернизм: как социальная и культурная теории объясняют наше время. М., Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 560 с.
Pavlov A.V. 2019. Postpostmodernizm: kak social'naja i kul'turnaja teorii objasnjajut nashe vremja [Post-postmodernism: how social and cultural theories explain our time]. M., Izdatel'skij dom «Delo» RANHiGS, 560 p.
Павлов А.В. 2019. Образы современности в XXI веке: сверхмодернизм. Знание. Понимание. Умение, 1: 69–82.
Pavlov A. V. 2019. Images of Modernity in the 21st Century: Supermodernism. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 1: 69–82. (in Russian).
Augé М. 1992. Non-Lieux, introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris, Le Seuil, 155 p.
Borgmann A.1992. Crossing the postmodern divide. University of Chicago Press, 182 p.
Bourriaud N. 2009. Altermodern explained: manifesto. URL: https://www.e-flux.com/announcements/38261/altermodern-manifesto/(accessed: 25.01.2022).
Bourriaud N. 2009. The Radicant. Sternberg Press, 192 p.
Childish B., Thomson C. 2000. Remodernism 'towards a new spirituality in art'. URL: http://www.stuckism.com/remod.html (accessed: 19.01.2022).
Dussel E.D. 2012. Transmodernity and Interculturality: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Liberation. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3). URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6591j76r (accessed: 10.01.2022).
Eshelman R. 2008. Performatism, or the End of Postmodernism. The Davies Group Publishers, 288 р.
Grauer A. 1981. The Myth of Post-Modernism. URL: http://doktorgee.worldzonepro.com/Modern.htm (accessed: 15.01.2022).
Kirby А. 2006. The Death of Postmodernism And Beyond. Philosophy Now. URL: https://philosophynow.org/issues/58/The_Death_of_Postmodernism_And_Beyond (accessed: 18.01.2022).
Kirby А. 2009. Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. N.Y. Continuum, 288 p.
Kirby А. 2015. The Possibility of Cyber-Placelessness Digimodernism on a Planetary Platform. Elias, Amy J., and Christian Moraru. The Planetary Turn: Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 272 p.
Lipovetsky G. 2004. Les temps hypermodernes, éditions Grasset, 196 p.
Lipovetsky G., Sebastien C. 2005. Hypermodern Times. Cambridge: Polity Press, 150 p.
Moraru, C. 2011. Cosmodernism: American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the New Cultural Imaginary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 440 p.
Nealon J. 2012. Post-Postmodernism: or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism.Stanford University Press Stanford, California, 241 p.
Nicolescu B. 2014. From Modernity to Cosmodernity. Science, Culture, and Spirituality. State University of New York Press, 282 p.
Rodríguez Magda R. M. 1998. Y despues del postmodernismo ¿qué? [What about after postmodernism?], Barcelona, Anthropos, 400 p.-
Rodríguez Magda R. M. 1989. La sonrisa de Saturno: Hacia una teoría transmoderna [Smile of Saturn. Towards a transmodernist theory], Barcelona, Anthropos, 270 p.
Rodríguez Magda R. M. 2004. Transmodernidad [Transmodern], Barcelona. Anthropos, 222 p.
Rudrum D., Stavris N. (eds.) 2015. Supplanting the postmodern. An anthology of writings on the arts and culture of the early 21st century. Bloomsbury academic, 400 p.
Samuels R. 2008. Auto-Modernity After Postmodernism: Autonomy and Automation in Culture, Technology, and Education. Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected T. McPherson (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Samuels R. 2009. New Media, Cultural Studies, and Critical Theory after Postmodernism: Automodernity from Zizek to Laclau, Palgrave Macmillan, 267 p.
Sussman H. 2013. Review of Cosmodernism: American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the New Cultural Imaginary, by Christian Moraru. MLN, vol. 128 no. 5. Project Muse. URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/535743 (accessed: 15.01.2022).
Turner L. 2011. Metamodernist Manifesto. URL: http://www.metamodernism.org/ (accessed: 23.01.2022).
Vermeulen T., Akker R., van den 2017. Notes on metamodernism. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/full/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677 (accessed: 23.01.2022).
Abstract views: 114
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
