The methodology of science and applied analytics: the parameter of completeness of coverage and completeness of accounting for the determining factors in the study

Authors

  • Igor.V. Ponkin Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Moscow, Russia) (IPACS, RANEPA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-2-212-219

Keywords:

science, applied analytics, research methodology, parameters of scientific and / or analytical quality of research

Abstract

The significance, content and features of such a qualitative parameter of scientific research and applied analytical research as completeness are pranalized. It is shown that the set of questions about the actual and most adequately reflecting the objectivity of the parameters of scientific quality of scientific research is one of the most complex and at the same time poorly studied. The author shows the measure of the parameter of completeness of coverage and completeness of accounting for determining factors-in relation to scientific or applied analytical research. A review of definitions and interpretations of the research completeness parameter presented in the scientific literature is given. The author shows the place of the studied parameter in the total volume of other key parameters of the study, especially the relationship with them. In particular, the author considers the parameters of integrity, clarity, depth, and latitude. The article offers the author's concept of interpretation and explanation of this parameter. The author's classification of the internal structure of the integral parameter under study is presented.

Author Biography

Igor.V. Ponkin, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Moscow, Russia) (IPACS, RANEPA)

Professor, doctor of legal Scienc-es, Professor of chair of state and municipal man-agement faculty of state and municipal manage-ment Institute of public service and administration of Russian presidential Academy of national econ-omy and state service under the RF President, Moscow, Russia

References

Лурия А.Р. 1979. Язык и сознание. М., Издательство Московского университета. 320 с.

Майданов А.С. 1993. Искусство открытия: Методология и логика научного творчества. М., Репро. 175 с.

Новосёлов М.М. 2009. Аналитические и синтетические суждения. В кн.: Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки. М., Канон+; Реабилитация. 1248 с.

Пойа Д. 1976. Математическое открытие: Пер. с англ. 2-е изд. М., Наука. 452 с. (George Polya. 1952, 1965. Mathematical Discovery. On understanding, learning and teaching problem solving. New York, John Wiley & sons, inc., Vol. I, Vol. II.)

Понкин И.В., Редькина А.И. 2020. Методология научных исследований и прикладной аналитики. М.: Буки Веди. 365 с.

Рузавин Г.И. 1975. Методы научного исследования. М., Мысль. 237 с.

Селье Г. 1987. От мечты к открытию: Как стать учёным: Пер. с англ. М., Прогресс. 368 с. (Hans Selye. 1975. From Dream to Discovery. On Being a Scientist. New York: Arno press. 419 p.).

Сырых В.М. 2012. История и методология юридической науки: Учебник. М., Норма – ИНФРА-М. 464 с.

Трущелёв С.А. 2009. Медицинская диссертация: Руководство. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. М., ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 416 с.

Фёдоров Б.И. 2009. Условия рассуждения. В кн.: Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки. М., Канон+; Реабилитация. 1248 с. С. 1021–1022.

Чагров A.B. 2009. Полнота логических исчислений. В кн.: Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки. М., Канон+; Реабилитация: 718–719.

Чагров A.B. (2) 2009. Семантика возможных миров. В кн.: Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки. М., Канон+; Реабилитация: 843–844.

Bailey S. 2011 Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. Third edition. New York: Routledge. xx; 293 p.

Carter S., Guerin C., Aitchison C. 2020. Doctoral Writing: Practices, Processes and Pleasures. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. xiii; 219 p.

Fritchoff Davis M. 2010. Data cleaning. In: Encyclopedia of research design. Edited by Neil J. Salkind. 3 Vols. Thousand Oaks (California, USA), SAGE. xxxi; 1595 p. P. 325–328.

Kirkman J. 2005. Good Style: Writing for science and technology. Second edition. New York: Routledge. vi; 139 p.

Meloy J.M. 2002. Writing the qualitative dissertation: Understanding by Doing. Second Edition. Mahwah (New Jersey, USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. xvii; 217 p.

Simmel G. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated, edited, and with an introduction by Kurt H. Wolff. Glencoe (Illinois, USA), The Free Press. lxiv; 445 p.


Abstract views: 623

Share

Published

2020-08-05

How to Cite

Ponkin, I. (2020). The methodology of science and applied analytics: the parameter of completeness of coverage and completeness of accounting for the determining factors in the study. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 45(2), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-2-212-219

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Logic, methodology and philosophy of science

Copyright (c) 2020 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.