Prospects for Concluding a Social Contract on the Digitalization of Public Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-4-640-651Keywords:
public contract, stakeholders, digitalization, public governance, power, civil societyAbstract
Today, a new social contract is needed that reflects the realities of digital society. The article considers the prospects for concluding a social contract in the conditions of digitalization of public administration on the basis of a sociological study (expert and mass survey) conducted in 2020–2021. The findings show that the prevailing opinion of experts regarding a social contract is its representation as a mechanism for regulating the interaction of authorities and citizens in the digital space, the distribution of rights and obligations between them. Experts and interviewed people advocate the conclusion of a new social contract, in the initiation of which the state and civil society structures should play an equal role. The authors conclude that due to its status and functionality, as well as its legitimacy in the public's eyes, the interests of civil society can be represented by the Public Chambers of the Russian Federation and its subjects; and their sites in the socio-network space will become platforms for organizing dialogue between citizens and the authorities to discuss the parameters of digitalization of society and public governance.
Acknowledgements
The reported study was funded by RFBR and EISR according to the research project No. 20-011-31535 "Public governance in a digital society: towards a new social contract".
Downloads
References
Адамская Л., Ракинцев Д. 2019. Требуются стейкхолдеры. Самоуправление. 1(114): 81–86.
Аузан А.А. 2005. Общественный договор и гражданское общество. Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 14 (3): 3–18.
Буданов В.Г., Белотелов Н.В., Колесова Л.А., Курдюмов В.С., Олескин А.В. 2019. Социальный договор. Отв. ред. А. В. Щербаков. М., Грифон. 95 с.
Василенко Л.А., Зотов В.В., Захарова С.А. 2020. Использование потенциала социальных медиа в становлении участвующего управления. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология, 20 (4): 864–876.
Ильичёва Л.Е., Лапин А.В., Кремер П. 2021. Доверие в системе базовых ценностей России и Германии: последствия пандемии. Проблемы национальной стратегии. 1 (64): 97–118.
Ролз Дж. 2010. Теория справедливости. М.: URSS, 534 с. (Rawls J. 1999. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 538 p.)
Слепаков С.С. 2016. Четверть века России в новом времени: общественные интересы, глобальная конкуренция и стейкхолдер-менеджмент. Философия хозяйства, 3 (105): 75–83.
Тихонов А.В., Акимкин Е.М., Богданов В.С., Бунов Е.Г., Быков К.В., Градосельская Г.В., Гусейнова К.Э., Докука С.В., Жаворонков А.В., Карпов И.А., Королев А.Л., Леньков Р.В., Мерзляков А.А., , Просянюк Д.В., Рабинович Е.И., Шилова В.А., Щербина В.В. 2017. Россия: реформирование властно-управленческой вертикали в контексте проблем социокультурной модернизации регионов. Отв. ред. А.В. Тихонов. М., ФНИСЦ РАН, 432 с.
Хабермас Ю. 2001. Вовлечение другого. Очерки политической теории. СПб: Наука, 312 с. (Habermas J. 2000. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory / Reprint Edition. Cambridge, MA, 338 p.)
Явлинский Г.А. 2005. Общественный договор – основа долгосрочной экономической стратегии. Мир России, 14 (4): 3–29.
Bonnafous‐Boucher М., Porcher S. 2010. Towards a stakeholder society: Stakeholder theory vs theory of civil society. European Management Review, 7 (4): 205–216.
Brennan J., Buchanan J. 2005. The reason for the rules. Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168 p.
Crane A., Matten D., Moon J. 2004. Stakeholders as Citizens? Rethinking Rights, Participation, and Democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2): 107–122.
Freeman R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman. 279 p.
Freeman R.E. 2020. The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. In: Beschorner T., Brink A., Hollstein B., Hübscher M.C., Schumann O. (eds) Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. Pp. 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16205-4_55
Gauthier D. 1997. Political Contractarianism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(2): 132–148.
Heath J., Norman W. 2004. Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What Can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach Us in the Post-Enron Era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53 (3): 247–266.
Nozik R. 2008. Anarchy, state and utopia. New-York, Basic Books, 400 p.
Parmar B.L., Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C., Purnell L., Colle S. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1): 495–581. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581
Southwood N. 2010. Contractualism and the Foundations of Morality. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 216 p.
Abstract views: 133
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
