The french philosophy of the classical age and the ourdays: two images of the modernity

Authors

  • Alexander V. Dyakov Saint-Petersburg State University

Keywords:

modernity, philosophy, history of philosophy, Enlightenment, postmodernity, reflection

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of philosophical modernity as a conceptual concept that fixes the key moments of self-understanding of modern philosophy. The author proposes to typify philosophical reflection on modernity in such a way that one can talk about its various models. Conducting a comparative analysis of the modernity of the classical era and the modernity of our time, he proposes to highlight the key points in both cases of philosophical reflection and clearly identify the features of their similarities and differences. Starting from the productive thought of M. Foucault, the author proposes to consider the classical model of modernity from the point of view of its reliance on the tradition of history and the historiography born in the Age of Enlightenment, while the current model, according to the author, is distinguished by a radical break with the historical tradition and reliance on the legal and philosophical discourse. Considering various types of philosophical modernity, the author comes to the conclusion about the impossibility of an integral definition of the phenomenon of modernity as a unique epistemological threshold, without taking at the same time the extremes of a culturological definition of this phenomenon as periodically repeating and typically reproduced.

Author Biography

Alexander V. Dyakov, Saint-Petersburg State University

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Ontology and Theory of Knowledge, St. Petersburg State University,
St. Petersburg, Russia

References

Жильсон Э. 2011. Дух средневековой философии. Гиффордовские лекции (университет Абердина). М., Институт философии, теологии и истории св. Фомы, 560 с.

Кант И. 1994. Сочинения. В 8-ми т. Т. 8. М., Чоро, 718 с.

Фуко М. 2010. Рождение биополитики. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978–1979 учебном году. Пер. А.В. Дьякова. СПб., Наука, 448 с.

Фуко М. 2011. Управление собой и другими. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1982–1983 учебном году. Пер. А.В. Дьякова. СПб., Наука, 432 с.

Бодрийяр Ж. 2000. Забыть Фуко. Пер. Д. Калугина. СПб., Владимир Даль, 96 с.

Бродель Ф. 1986–1992. Материальная цивилизация, экономика и капитализм XV–XVIII вв. В 3-х т. М., Прогресс.

Йонас Г., 1998. Гностицизм (гностическая религия). СПб., Лань, 384 с.

Слотердайк П. 2009. Критика цинического разума. Пер. А.В. Перцева. Екатеринбург, У-Фактория, 800 с.

Трофимова М.К. 1979. Историко-философские вопросы гностицизма. М., Наука, 216 с.

Фуко М. 2004. Археология знания. Пер. М.Б. Раковой. СПб., Гуманитарная Академия, 416 с.

Фуко М. 1994. Слова и вещи. Пер. В.П. Визгина и Н.С. Автономовой. СПб., A-cad, 408 с.

Хайдеггер М. 1993. Время и бытие. Пер. В.В. Бибихина. М., Республика, 448 с.

Шпенглер О. 1998. Закат Европы. В 2-х т. Пер. И.И. Маханькова. М., Мысль, 1280 с.

Baudrillard J. 1997. Le Paroxyste indifférent. Entretiens avec Ph. Petit. P.: Grasset, 1997.


Abstract views: 169

Share

Published

2021-03-30

How to Cite

Dyakov, A. V. (2021). The french philosophy of the classical age and the ourdays: two images of the modernity. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 46(1), 5-11. Retrieved from https://nomothetika-journal.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/100

Issue

Section

History of philosophy, social sciences and humanities