Father-Child Correspondence as an Experience of Connection between Generations in the Russian Cultural Tradition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2026-51-1-192-202Keywords:
man, father, family, son, daughter, letters, correspondence, valuesAbstract
The idea of confrontation between parents and children is embedded in myths. At present, though, the relationship between generations tend to acquire new features. Gerontocracy has become a political and educational issue, while in everyday life we face a very powerful multifunctional stratum of older generations, which includes mothers and grandmothers, slightly fewer fathers, and even fewer grandfathers. The older generations gave life to the younger ones, created culture, technologies, material and spiritual values, which are offered for use to the young. They are offered, instead of being mastered in the course of joint activity. The abundance of opportunities not conditioned by needs has given rise to a unique cultural crisis, the generation gap, which is believed to result from technology. Is this true, and is it possible to overcome the value gap? In the author's opinion, the problem consists not only in broken communications, but also in questioned humanity, since technologies are beginning to replace people and the relationships between them. Do the elders and previous generations have any experience? Overcoming the crisis requires, first of all, not just decisions and actions, but comprehension, philosophical reflection on what we call traditional values and ways of their genuine transmission, meaningful assimilation and actualization in everyday practices. One of the ways of preserving/returning/cultivating intergenerational connections may be found in the correspondence between parents (mostly fathers) and their children. These are famous fathers, whose names have been preserved by history. For centuries, such correspondence has been a common thing, a truly cultural practice of sharing worldly wisdom.
Downloads
References
Список литературы
Анкерсмит Ф.Р. 2009. История и тропология: взлет и падение метафоры. М.: «Канон +» РООИ «Реабилитация»: 400 с. (Ankersmit F.R. 1994. History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. University of Kalifornia Press. 256 p.).
Дмитрийчук А.Ю. 2018. Образ семьи в европейской и российской культурной традиции: философско-антропологический анализ. Автореф. дисс… канд. филос. наук. Белгород: 24 с.
Микешин М.И. 2023. Как быть в России «человеком чести». Философические письма. Русско-европейский диалог, 6 (3): 159-170. DOI:10.17323/2658-5413-2023-6-3-159-170.
Ростова Н.Н. 2020. Антропологический поворот в философии: антропология vs онтологияю Вестник Томского государственного университета. 456: 93–98.
Рябов О.В. 2001. Идея женственности России в сочинениях В. С. Соловьева и поиски национальной идентичности в отечественной историософии. Соловьевские исследования. 2 (2): 216–229.
Тищенко Н.В. 2016. Применение нарративного анализа в исследованиях культуры: Pro et contra. Общество: философия, история, культура. 5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/primenenie-narrativnogo-analiza-v-issledovaniyah-kultury-pro-et-contra (дата обращения: 25.07.2025).
Шкуратов В.А. 1997. Историческая психология. М.: Смысл: 502 с.
References
Ankersmit F.R. 2009. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory [History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor]. Moscow, Publ. «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya»: 400 p. (Ankersmit F.R. 1994. History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. University of Kalifornia Press. 256 p.).
Dmitriichuk A.Yu. 2018. Obraz sem'i v evropeiskoi i rossiiskoi kul'turnoi traditsii: filosofsko-antropologicheskii analiz [The Image of the Family in the European and Russian Cultural Tradition: A Philosophical and Anthropological Analysis]. Abstract. diss… cand. filos. sciences. Belgorod. 24 p.
Mikeshin M.I. 2023. Kak byt' v Rossii «chelovekom chesti» [How to be a «man of honor» in Russia]. In: Filosoficheskie pis'ma. Russko-evropeiskii dialog [Philosophical letters. Russian-European dialogue], 6 (3): 159–170. DOI:10.17323/2658-5413-2023-6-3-159-170/
Rostova N.N. 2020. Antropologicheskii povorot v filosofii: antropologiya vs ontologiya [The Anthropological Turn in Philosophy: Anthropology vs. Ontology]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 456: 93–98. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/456/10
Ryabov O. V.2001. Ideya zhenstvennosti Rossii v sochineniyakh V. S. Solov'eva i poiski natsional'noi identichnosti v otechestvennoi istoriosofii [The idea of femininity of Russia in the works of V. S. Solovyov and the search for national identity in Russian historiosophy]. In: Solov'evskie issledovaniya. 2 (2): 216–229.
Tishchenko N.V. 2016. Primenenie narrativnogo analiza v issledovaniyakh kul'tury: Pro et contra. In: Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura. 5. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ primenenie-narrativnogo-analiza-v-issledovaniyah-kultury-pro-et-contra (accessed: 25.07.2025).
Shkuratov V.A. 1997. Istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Historical Psychology]. Moscow, Publ. Smysl: 502 p.
Abstract views: 0
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
