The Role of Information Policy in the State Management and National Security Formation

Authors

  • Andrey A. Kovalev Northwestern Institute of Management – a branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-129-138

Keywords:

information, information technology, public administration, national identity

Abstract

Information policy in government plays a significant role, which should be investigated and taken into account in the formation and development of the national policy of the country. Thus, the modern state faces the responsible task of organizing a viable public-state dialogue, ensuring its own stability and maintaining control over civil society by regulating such an important element of public administration as information policy. The purpose of the study was to determine the role and importance of information policy in the field of public administration and national security. The work is based on a systematic approach to the study of information policy, which allows us to consider it as an important part of public administration in the context of ensuring national security. The broad opportunities provided by information development to modern society at the same time carry high risks, which can be overcome by combining innovations and traditions, as well as increasing manageability in order to control information flows and information development of society and the state as a whole. There are currently no comprehensive studies on the topic under consideration. At the same time, theoretical and methodological developments in each of the areas included in this topic (state policy, information policy and national security) can become the basis for further study of them in conjunction with orientation to conjunctural changes in various areas of life. The article presents for the first time a comprehensive study of the role of information policy both in state governance and in the formation of national security, which is an essential condition for maintaining the stability of state power and the state itself as a whole. The author concludes that at the present stage of society's development, information policy is an integral part of state policy and should be one of the most important areas of state control. In order to maintain its stability, the state is obliged not only to form an information policy, but also to engage in its constant development, taking into account both technological innovations and national principles, customs and traditions in order to preserve national identity and a correct worldview from the position of the state among representatives of this civil society.

Author Biography

Andrey A. Kovalev, Northwestern Institute of Management – a branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Administration, North-Western Institute of Management – a branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation,
St. Petersburg, Russia.

References

Бриллюэн Л. 2006. Научная неопределённость и информация. М., Наука, 272 с.

Винер Н. 2003. Творец и Будущее. М., АСТ, 733 с.

Волочаева О.Ф. 2020. Активность акторов политики в информационном обществе: практики и тенденции развития. Евразийский союз ученых, 5-11(74): 54–57.

Долженкова Е., Межевич Н.М., Хлутков А.Д. 2022. Секьюризация информационной политики: обобщая накопленный опыт 2022 года. Управленческое консультирование, 12(168): 10–17.

Купряшин Г.Л. 2012. Модернизация государственного управления: институты и интересы. М., Издательство Московского университета, 312 с.

Кучерявый М.М. 2013. Основные факторы влияния политики информационной безопасности на национальную безопасность современной России. Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика, 14: 164–168.

Кучерявый М.М. 2014. Роль информационной составляющей в системе политики обеспечения национальной безопасности Российской Федерации. Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена, 164: 155–163.

Мараховский Е.Л. 2018. К вопросу методологий исследования современной информационной политики. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник финансового университета, 2: 86–91.

Моль А. 2008. Социодинамика культуры. М., Издательство ЛКИ, 416 с.

Перкова Д.В., Худолеев А.Н. 2017. Информационная безопасность и противодейтсвие экстремизму в контексте реализации государственной национальной политики. Вопросы национальных и федеративных отношений, 3(38): 74–81.

Позднякова А.Э. 2015. Особенности разработки и реализации государственной политики в России. Теория и практика общественного развития, 17: 122–124.

Родачин В.М. 2021. Феномен государственной политики: сущность и виды. Гуманитарные науки. Вестник финансового университета, 6(11): 46–53.

Стрельцов А.И. 2010. Государственная информационная политика: основы теории. М., МЦНМО, 107 с.

Троянская М.А. 2020. Зарубежный опыт информационного обеспечения деятельности органов государственного управления. Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление, 2(31): 340–343.

Фролов Н.В. 2016. Проблемы реализации государственной политики России в сфере информационной безопасности. Теории и проблемы политических исследований, 4: 84–96.

Шеннон К. 1963. Работы по теории информации и кибернетике. М., Изд-во иностранной литературы, 832 с.

Эльбивеа Л.Р. 2023. Государственная информационная политика Российской Федерации. Тенденции развития науки и образования, 98-6: 135–138.

Ashby W.R. 1962. Principles of the self-organizing system. Principles of Self-Organization: Transactions of the University of Illinois Symposium, H. Von Foerster and G. W. Zopf, Jr. (eds.), Pergamon Press: London, UK, pp. 255–278.

Bell D. 1973. The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. N.Y., Publ. Basic Books, 507 p.

Braman S. 2011. Defining information policy. Journal of Information Policy, 1(1): 1–5.

Hill M. W. 1995. Information Policies: premonitions and prospects. Journal of Information Science, 21(4): 273–282.

Hodwood B., Gunn L. 1989. Policy Analysis of the Real World. Publ. Oxford University Press, 289 p.

Kainz P. 2012. Unbegrenzte Möglichkeiten? Probleme und Aporien des Individualismus. Baden-Baden, Publ. Nomos, 367 p.

Mason M.G. 1983. The federal role in library and information services. White Plains, N.Y., Knowledge Industry Publishers Inc., 150 p.

Lahera Parada E. 2004. Política y política pública. Santiago, Publ. Naciones Unidas, CEPAL, División de Desarrollo Social, 32 p.

Paleri P. 2008. National security: Imperatives and challenges. New Delhi, Publ. Tata McGraw-Hill, 285 p.

Porat M.U. 1976. The Information Economy. Washington, Publ. Office Press, 118 p.

Romm J.J. 1993. Defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects. Pew Project on America’s Task in a Changed World (Pew Project Series). New York, Council on Foreign Relations, 122 p.

Sudorgin O., Ivanov V., Nitsevich V., Nesterchuk O. 2023. Information policy as a resource for state management. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia), 11: 139–148.

Weingarten F.W. 1989. Federal Information Policy Development: The Congressional perspective. In: C. McClure, P. Hernon, and H. Relyea (Eds.), United States Government Information Policies: views and Perspectives. N.J., Norwood, Publ. Ablex, 349 p.

Wolfers, A.O., Nitze, P.H, King, J.E. 1959. Developments in military technology and their impact on United States strategy and foreign policy. Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research for U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 73 p.


Abstract views: 34

Share

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Kovalev, A. A. (2024). The Role of Information Policy in the State Management and National Security Formation. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 49(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-129-138

Issue

Section

Human. Culture. Society. Morality