Constitutional Experience of the Formalization of Marriage in European and American States

Authors

  • Sergey Nikolaevich Degtyarev Kuban State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2022-47-3-508-515

Keywords:

marriage, family, subjective right, special status, powers, provision, man and woman, state

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is mediated by the importance of the institution of marriage in the humanities and law, in particular. Thus, in the constitutional branch of science, the institution of marriage did not act as an independent subject of research. In the applied aspect, the relevance is confirmed by changes at a high constitutional level, when the Basic Law of Russia in 2020 was supplemented by paragraph "j.1" of Part 1 of Article 72 on the protection of the institution of marriage as a union of a man and a woman. Taken together, the arguments pushed the author to a comparative legal study, the results of which made it possible to propose a set of criteria for analyzing foreign constitutions for fixing various aspects of marriage in them. The catalog of the main criteria by the author includes the following provisions formalizing marriage in the context of subjective law, definitions and blank norms; protection / protection of marriage; procedural aspects of marriage; marriage in the security context of other statuses; marriage in the context of the powers of the state and its bodies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sergey Nikolaevich Degtyarev , Kuban State University

Lecturer of the Department of Civil Procedure and International Law, Faculty of Law, Kuban State University,

Krasnodar, Russia

References

Афанасик Д.А. 2018. Сопоставительный анализ содержания концептов «брак / matrimonio»: экспериментальное исследование. Этнопсихолингвистика, 1: 92–111.

Дерендяева С.Д. 2022. Фиктивный брак в зарубежном законодательстве. Теория права и меж-государственных отношений, 1-9(21): 36–43.

Кулиев Д.Т. 2022. Брак в контексте института личного статуса в исламском праве. Законода-тельство, 1: 68–77.

Куткин В.С. 2017. Брак церковный и брак гражданский: понятие, содержание, взаимосвязь. Пробелы в российском законодательстве, 1: 109–112.

Ли Ч. 2022. Всеобщий и ранний брак: брачные представления и поведение русских крестьян ХVIII-ХIХ вв. Вопросы истории, 6-1: 34–48.

Мэггс П.Б. 2022. Трансформация права: онлайн-брак и нотариальное удостоверение без гра-ниц. Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), 1(89): 39–43.

Обносов В.Н., Седых Е.А. 2020. «Гражданский брак» как проблема современной российской семьи. Наука и Образование, 3(4): 357.

Полякова Ю.А. 2020. Семья и брак как Общеправовая конструкция. Человек. Социум. Обще-ство, 8: 46–57.

Токоева А.Т. 2022. Брак как основной институт государства. Известия Национальной Акаде-мии наук Кыргызской Республики, 1: 123–126.


Abstract views: 127

Share

Published

2022-10-03

How to Cite

Degtyarev , S. N. (2022). Constitutional Experience of the Formalization of Marriage in European and American States. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 47(3), 508-515. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2022-47-3-508-515

Issue

Section

Public law (state-legal) sciences