Constitutional and Legal Dimension Artificial Intelligence in the BRICS Countries (Using the Example of India)

Authors

  • Evgenii V. Aristov Perm State National Research University
  • Ksenia M. Belikova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2022-47-2-238-250

Keywords:

human rights and freedoms, artificial intelligence (AI), BRICS, India, the Constitution of India 1949, welfare state, sociality, justice and non-discrimination, principles of AI functioning, transparency and accountability of AI, right to privacy, freedom of speech and expression, self-censorship

Abstract

In view of the relevance and practical significance the article touches upon some facets of the constitutional and legal dimension of artificial intelligence (AI) in one of the BRICS countries, friendly India, reflected in a number of provisions of the Indian Constitution of 1949 (as amended in 2019), fixing human rights and freedoms (expression of opinions, privacy, etc.) in the context of its` filling with new meanings and interpretation in the context of AI development. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that many states seek to implement the strategies they have adopted for the development of artificial intelligence, which requires to strengthen understanding of the approaches of Russia and foreign countries, including the ones advanced in the development and implementation of such technologies from the perspective of law. The scientific novelty of the research is determined by the goal itself and the results of the work. So, based on the study of the approaches of the doctrine, the provisions of the Constitution and 2019 draft version of proposed Indian personal data law likewise authors personal opinions the authors found that, in particular, the general orientation of the practiced and fixed normatively - at the level of the Constitution and its judicial and doctrinal interpretations – and legally, including draft laws, restrictions on human rights and freedoms in the modern period on the example of India, can be described as a desire to find a justification for such restrictions in a large significant public interest, subject to protection with priority over the protection of the interests of private individuals. As for the necessary restrictions on the rights of AI, if AI is modeled after the constitutional model of a person (human being), then first the restrictions imposed on the latter will inevitably be imposed on its “copy” - artificial intelligence.

Author Biographies

Evgenii V. Aristov, Perm State National Research University

Doctor of  Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Administrative and Constitutional Law, Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia

ORCID 0000-0003-2445-3840

Ksenia M. Belikova

Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure and International Private Law of Law Institute of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow,
Russia ORCID 0000-0001-8068-1616

References

Аристов Е.В. 2015. Государство благосостояния в Южно-Африканской Республике. Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики, 12: 22–25.

Аристов Е.В. 2015а. Понятие и концепция общественного блага. Право и современные государства, 5: 10–16.

Аристов Е.В. 2015. Социальность государства в Индии. Нравственные императивы в праве, 3: 19–28.

Аристов Е.В. 2017. Социальность государства в правовых позициях Верховного суда Индии. Право и государство: теория и практика, 3: 114–118.

Аристов Е.В. 2016. Тенденции и перспективы развития законодательства Российской Федерации во исполнение конституционного принципа социальности государства. Образование. Наука. Научные кадры, 3: 16–19.

Беликова К.М. 2021. Направления и перспективы развития и применения искусственного интеллекта в военной сфере в ЮАР. Право и политика, 9: 1–23.

Беликова К.М., Ахмадова М.А. 2022. Правовое регулирование новых военных технологий в свете законодательства об интеллектуальной собственности и ответственность ученого в странах БРИКС. Изд.: Типография ООО "МДМпринт" (Печатный салон МДМ), 528 с.

Беликова К.М. 2021a. Развитие искусственного интеллекта в Бразилии: акцент на военную сферу

и вопросы интеллектуальной собственности. Право и политика, 10: 1–21.

Беликова К.М. 2021b. Современные военные технологии и ответственность ученого, создателя, оператора и др.: некоторые подходы стран БРИКС. Пробелы в российском законодательстве, 6: 142–150.

Беликова К.М. 2011. Социально-ориентированные императивы в латиноамериканских гражданских кодексах. Нравственные императивы в праве, 3: 39–46.

Беликова К.М. 2013. Экономика права в свете «неэкономической» концепции эффективности как компенсационного социального равновесия: взаимосвязь равновесия интересов

и благосостояния. Экономика и право. XXI век, 3: 7–13.

Бондарь Н.С. 2019. Информационно-цифровое пространство в конституционном измерении: из практики Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации. Журнал российского права, 11: 25–42.

Наумов А.О., Положевич Р.С. 2018. «Мягкая сила» Индии как суверенного государства: история и современность (Часть II). Государственное управление. Электронный Вестник, 70: 291–328.

Нечкин А.В. 2020. Конституционно-правовой статус искусственного интеллекта в России: настоящее и будущее. Lex russica, 8: 78–85.

Belikova K.M. 2021. Marco legal para o uso da inteligência artificial na esfera militar da Índia no contexto da proteção dos direitos de patente (Legal framework for the use of artificial intelligence in India’s military sphere in the context of patent rights protection). Laplage Em Revista, 7(2): 671–690.

Jobin A., Ienca M. and Vayena E. 2019. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1: 389–399.

Köhler G. 2014. Is There an «Asian Welfare State Model» East and South Asian Trajectories and Approaches to the Welfare State. A presentation made to the Conference “Re-Thinking Asia II. Building New Welfare States: What Asia and Europe can learn from each other”, organized by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) on 28–29 October 2013 in Tutzing, Germany: р. 5

Koops E.-J., Di Carlo A., Nocco L., Casamassima V., Stradella E. 2013. Robotic Technologies and Fundamental Rights: Robotics Challenging the European Constitutional Framework. International Journal of Technoethics, 2: 1198–1219.

Mittelstadt, B., Patrick, A., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S & Floridi, L. 2016. The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society, р. 3.

Seth S. 2017. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Interactions with the Right to Privacy. Economic and Political Weekly, 51: 66–70.

Welfare state and education. 1986. Rao, M V. Rama. Public policy formulation: a study of national policy on education. Thesis. Guided by Sudershanam, G. Completed 29/12/1999 at the Department of Political Science, University of Hyderabad: р. 26.


Abstract views: 93

Share

Published

2022-07-04

How to Cite

Aristov, E. V., & Belikova, K. M. (2022). Constitutional and Legal Dimension Artificial Intelligence in the BRICS Countries (Using the Example of India). NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 47(2), 238-250. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2022-47-2-238-250

Issue

Section

Public law (state-legal) sciences