Liberty and Individual Autonomy: To the Question of Private Space

Authors

  • Lesya V. Chesnokova Dostoevsky Omsk State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-4-679-688

Keywords:

privacy, publicity, autonomy, paternalism, care, civility

Abstract

The article examines freedom and autonomy of the individual in connection with the right to private space, which arose in European societies of the New Age in connection with the processes of urbanization and individualization. The condition of the existence of privacy is the presence of an autonomous, in need of own physical and mental space of the individual and society, recognizing his right to his physical and psychological integrity and autonomy as the right to make their own decisions regarding their own lives. The ability to make such decisions runs counter to the attitudes of paternalism, according to which it is possible to interfere with the decisions of the individual if it is supposed to be for his benefit. Caring for an individual is assessed differently in different cultural contexts. In societies where respect for freedom and the dignity of the individual is a priority, it can be perceived as interfering with and degrading the private sphere. The preferred social distance in the public sphere is to give a person the freedom and the opportunity to make his own choices and be responsible for him. The right to private space implies that everyone can determine his own destiny and autonomous in their decisions.

Author Biography

Lesya V. Chesnokova, Dostoevsky Omsk State University

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology, F.M. Dostoevsky Omsk State University,
Omsk, Russia

References

Горнова Г.В. 2014. Философия города. М., Форум, 342 с.

Евстифеева Е.А., Майкова Э.Ю., Козлов А.Г. 2016. Приватность в эпоху вовлеченности. Власть, 1: 36–40.

Зиммель Г. 2002. Большие города и духовная жизнь. Логос, 3–4. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/logos/2002/3/zim.html (дата обращения: 29 января 2021).

Кравченко И.И. 2001. Приватность. В кн.: Новая философская энциклопедия. М., Мысль. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/8928/ (дата обращения 29 января 2021).

Милль Дж. 2000. О свободе. В кн.: Антология мировой либеральной мысли (I половины ХХ века). М., Прогресс-Традиция: 288–392.

Радкау Й. 2017. Эпоха нервозности. Германия от Бисмарка до Гитлера. Пер. с нем. Н. Штильмарк. Изд. дом ВШЭ, 552 с. (Radkau J. Zeitalter der Nervosität. Deutschland zwischen Bismark und Hitler. München, Carl Hanser Verlag, 1998, 551 s.).

Чеснокова Л. В. 2019. Индивидуализированное общество как социокультурный фундамент приватности. Идеи и идеалы, 11 (3): 375–389. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2019-11.3.2-375–389.

Чеснокова Л.В. 2020. Право на приватность в либеральной философии Нового времени. Гуманитарный вектор, 15(3): 33–42. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-2-33-42.

Волковинська В.О. 2014. Публiчне i приватне у феноменологiчному пошуку смислу соцiальностi. Збiрник наукових праць «Гiлея: науковий вiсник», 88: 182–185.

Böhme G. 2018. Eine Kultur der Privatheit. In: Kultur der Privatheit in der Netzgesellschaft. Hrsg. von G. Böhme, U. Gahlings. Bielefeld, Aisthesis: 17–28.

Gavison R. 2007. Privacy and the limits of law. In: Philosophical Dimensions for Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by F. D. Schoeman. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 365–366.

Habermas J. 2015. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Fr. а. M., Suhrkamp Verlag: 391 s.

Lotter M. 2016. Scham, Schuld, Verantwortung. Über die kulturellen Grundlagen der Moral. Berlin, Suhrkamp: 344 s.

Pollman A. 2019. Schmerz, lass` nach. Die körperliche Hülle als Schauplatz autodestruktiver Privatisierung. In: Die Grenzen des Privaten. Hrsg. von S. Seubert, P. Niessen. Baden-Baden, Nomos: 165–180.

Prentki J. V. 2016. Die anthopologische Funktion der Privatheit. Norderstedt, GRIN: 10 s.

Reiman J. 2007. Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood. In: Philosophical Dimensions for Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by F.D. Schoeman. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 300–317.

Ritter M. 2008. Die Dynamik von Privatheit und Öffentlichkeit in modernen Gesellschaften. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 139 s.

Rössler B. 2018. Autonomie. Ein Versuch über das gelungene Leben. Berlin, Suhrkamp: 442 s.

Rössler B. 2001. Der Wert des Privaten. Fr. a. M. Suhrkamp, 2001: 379 s.

Sofsky W. 2007. Verteidigung des Privaten. Eine Streitschrift. München, Beck: 158 s.


Abstract views: 134

Share

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Chesnokova, L. V. (2021). Liberty and Individual Autonomy: To the Question of Private Space. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 46(4), 679-688. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-4-679-688

Issue

Section

Human. Culture. Society