The Question of Wearing Religious Vestments in a State Educational Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-3-569–575Keywords:
cassock, laicality of the state, laicality of education in state educational organizations, religious vestments, culture, education, theologyAbstract
The article is devoted to the assessment of the legal admissibility and the possibility of wearing a cassock (vestment with signs of a religious one) by a religious minister of the Russian Orthodox Church (and at the same time a secular scientist and teacher) in a state educational organization, in which he holds a position under an employment contract or performs duties under a civil law contract, during office hours. The reason for the appearance of this article was a number of conflicts that occurred in this regard in Russian universities. The article touches upon problematic issues intersecting with the theme of wearing elements of Muslim religious clothing in France, Germany, Russia and other countries. The article touches upon the issues of the content and ontology of the secular state of the state, in the author's concept.
Downloads
References
О правовой и фактической необоснованности включения теологической науки в «религиоведение» и отказа во включении отдельной специальности «теология» в Номенклатуру специальностей научных работников 2010. Сост. Понкин И.В. М., Ин-т гос.-конфессиональных отношений и права, 139 с.
Перспективы развития теологического образования в России : сборник материалов. Сост. Понкин И.В. 2007. М., Ин-т гос.-конфессиональных отношений и права,100 с.
Понкин И.В. 2003. Мусульманский платок в светской школе. Проявление религиозной принадлежности в государственных и муниципальных образовательных учреждениях: правомерность, допустимость и ограничения. Образование, 6: 15–22.
Laïcité et liberté religieuse: Recueil de textes et de jurisprudence. 2011. Paris, Direction de l’information légale et administrative. 502 p.
Liberté religieuse et régimes des cultes en Droit français. 2005. Textes, pratique administrative, jurisprudence. Nouvelle édition. Ed. par J. Dufaux, P. Dupuy, J.-P. Durand, C. Dutheil de la Rochère, F. Gasztowtt, M. Guillaume, A.-V. Hardel, B. Jeuffroy. Paris, Les Éditions du Cerf. xviii; 1853 p.
Pena-Ruiz H. 2003. Qu’est-ce que la laïcité? Paris, Gallimard.
Poulat É. 2001. La laïcité qui nous gouverne. Au nom de l’État. Documents-Episcopat. Bulletin du Secrétariat de la Conférence des évêques de France. No 8/9.
Ryabykh Ph., Ponkin I. 2012. The wearing of Christian baptismal crosses. Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale. No. 32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/1971-8543/2495
Traité de Droit français des religions. 2003. Sous la direction de F. Messner, P.-H. Prélot, J. M. Woehrling. Paris, Éditions du Juris-Classeur. xvii; 1317 p.
Abstract views: 99
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
