People's power resources in the development of justice: domestic experience

Authors

  • Nina V. Stus Russian State University of Justice, North-Caucasian Branch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-2-376-384

Keywords:

people's assessors, arbitration assessors, public defender, jury trial

Abstract

Article 32 of the Russian Constitution provides for the right of citizens to participate in the administration of justice. Currently, the Russian justice system implements two forms of such participation – trial by jury and arbitration assessors. The jurisdiction of cases to the jury is significantly reduced. A negligible number of cases involving arbitration assessors are considered. In this regard, the article examines the possibility of using other models of people's participation in the administration of justice: the introduction of the court of people's (judicial) assessors; the expansion of the possibility of considering cases with the participation of arbitration assessors; the revival of the institution of public defenders and public prosecutors; the reform of the jury court. The article presents the results of the analysis of doctrinal and legal sources, taking into account the ongoing judicial reform. It is reasonable that in the future, the people's power resource will be fully involved in the administration of justice, and the changes will be of an essential nature, aimed at further constitutionalization of the judiciary as a sphere of state activity.

Author Biography

Nina V. Stus, Russian State University of Justice, North-Caucasian Branch

Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of General Theoretical Legal Disciplines

References

Гегель. 1990. Философия права. М., Мысль, 53 c.

Джавахян Р.М. 2017. Совершенствование форм участия граждан в осуществлении правосудия как механизм конституционного преобразования судебной власти. Российский юридический журнал, 2: 45–54.

Зайков Д.Е. 2019. Институт арбитражных заседателей: современное состояние и перспективы. Российская юстиция, 7: 55–57.

Куницын А.П. 1843. Историческое изображение древнего судопроизводства в России. СПб, 33 с.

Лакоба А.Д. 2018. О некоторых аспектах судебной защиты прав человека и права граждан на участие в отправлении правосудия. Адвокатская практика, 4: 40–42.

Макогон Б.В. 2007. Общая характеристика процессов глобализации в правовой сфере. История государства и права, 3: 2–4.

Макогон Б.В. 2012. Способы интернационализационного национального права в условиях глобализации. Общество и право, 2 (39): 36–41.

Мархгейм М.В., Новикова А.Е. 2008. Правозащитные приоритеты в воззрениях отечественных представителей либеральной и консервативной научных школ. История государства и права, 6: 38–40.

Очередько В.П. 2018. Развитие форм участия граждан в отправлении правосудия в России. Ленинградский юридический журнал, 3(53): 243–252.

Памятники русского права. Вып. 2. 1953. М., Госюриздат, 218 с.

Belkin A. 2009. Disputed merits and undoubted shortcomings of the jury. Russian law: theory and practice, 2: 196–203.

Butko, L.V., Markhgeym, M.V., Novikova, A.E., Pozharova, L.A., Tonkov, E.E. 2017. Personal Dignity in the European Legal Culture. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, Vol. 6, 4: 296–303.


Abstract views: 351

Share

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Stus, N. V. (2021). People’s power resources in the development of justice: domestic experience. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 46(2), 376-384. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-2-376-384

Issue

Section

Public law (state-legal) sciences