P. Bourdieu's theory in military sociology: Military capital and professional mobility

Authors

  • Ekaterina N. Karlova Military Educational and Scientific Centre of the Air Force "Professor N.E. Zhukovsky and Y.A. Gagarin Air Force Academy"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-2-263-273

Keywords:

military capital, military sociology, social origin, social mobility, inequality, military education

Abstract

Despite the absence of formal social barriers to promotion in the military service, there is evidence of unequal chances of choosing a military professional trajectory and military-professional mobility for people from different social groups. A productive but rarely used theoretical framework for military sociology is the concept of P. Bourdieu, which allows us to consider the military organization as a social field in which the military habitus is formed and military capital is accumulated. The purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical justification for the concept of "military capital" and an empirical assessment of the importance of the social origin and cultural capital of cadets as social grounds for choosing a military profession. The study is based on a questionnaire survey of military universities cadets. The study showed a significant proportion of cadets with initial level of military capital in its cultural, physical and social forms. Military education becomes a means of social mobility for provincial young people with an average level of academic performance. Cadets consider command-administrative, educational and physical capital to be the main resources for promotion in military service. The study showed the heuristic potential of P. Bourdieu's theory for explaining the features of professional mobility of military personnel within the army hierarchy, civil-military relations, and adaptation potential of military personnel after leaving the army.

Author Biography

Ekaterina N. Karlova, Military Educational and Scientific Centre of the Air Force "Professor N.E. Zhukovsky and Y.A. Gagarin Air Force Academy"

senior researcher

References

ЕГЭ как способ поступить в вуз: удобства и сложности. Аналитический обзор ВЦИОМ от 22 мая 2019 г. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/ege-kak-sposobpostupit-v-vuz-udobstva-i-slozhnosti (дата обращения: 23 января 2021).

Россия – спортивная страна! Аналитический обзор ВЦИОМ от 13 ноября 2019 г. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/rossiya-sportivnaya-strana- (дата обращения: 2 февраля 2021).

Социальные лифты: едут или стоят? Аналитический обзор ВЦИОМ. 25 июня 2020 г. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/soczialhye-lifty-edut-ili-stoyat (дата обращения: 2 февраля 2021).

Численность населения Российской Федерации по муниципальным образованиям на 1 января 2020 года. Информационно-аналитические материалы Федеральной службы государственной статистики. М. 2020. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13282 (дата обращения 25.01.2021) (дата обращения: 23 января 2021).

Бурдьё П. 2005. Различение: социальная критика суждения. Экономическая социология, 6(3): 25–48.

Бурдьё П. 2007. Социальное пространство и генезис «классов». В кн.: Социология социального пространства. Пер. с франц.; отв. ред. перевода Шматко, Н.А. СПб, Алетейя, 288 с.

Бурдьё П. 1998. Структура, габитус, практика. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 1(2): 44–59.

Бурдьё П. 2005. Формы капитала. Экономическая социология, 6 (3): 60–74.

Карлова Е.Н. 2021. Воспроизводство социальной структуры Вооруженных Сил в системе военного профессионального образования. Социологические исследования, 2: 81–91.

Хавенсон Т.Е., Чиркина Т.А. 2018. Образовательные переходы в России: социально-экономическое положение семьи и успеваемость. М, НИУ ВШЭ, 24 с.

Прахов И.А. 2017. Доступность высшего образования в условиях ЕГЭ: источники возникновения и распространения неравенства. В кн.: Образование и социальная дифференциация. Отв. ред. Карной М., Фрумин И.Д., Кармаева Н.Н. М., Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики: 282–310.

Радаев В.В. 2002. Понятие капитала, формы капиталов и их конвертация. Экономическая социология, 3 (4): 20–32.

Смирнов А.И. 2015. Трудоустройство и занятость военных пенсионеров. Вестник Института социологии, 15: 129–148.

Шматко Н.А. 2005. «Социальные пространства» Пьера Бурдьё. В кн.: Бурдьё П. Социальное пространство: поля и практики. Пер. с франц.; Отв. ред. перевода, сост. и послесл. Шматко, Н.А. СПб, Алетейя: 576 с.

Abraham T, Cheney A.M., Curran G.M. 2017. A Bourdieusian Analysis of U.S. Military Culture Ground in the Mental Help-Seeking Literature. American Journal of Men’s Health. September:1358-1365. DOI: 10.1177/1557988315596037

Clark S. M., Hack-Polay D., Bal P. M. 2020. Social Mobility and Promotion of Officers to Senior Ranks in the Royal Navy: Meritocracy or Class Ceiling? Armed Forces & Society, 1-23 DOI: 10.1177/0095327X20905118

Cooper L., Caddick N., Godier L., Cooper A., Fossey M. 2016. Transition From the Military Into Civilian Life: An Exploration of Cultural Competence. Armed Forces & Society, 44 (1): 156–177.

Feaver P. D. 2005. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight and Civil-Military Relations. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 381 р.

Hajjar R. M. 2005. The Public Military High School A Powerful Educational Possibility. Armed Forces & Society, 32 (1): 44–62.

Hinojosa R., Hinojosa M. S., Nguyen J. 2019. Military Service and Physical Capital: Framing Musculoskeletal Disorders Among American Military Veterans Using Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Capital. Armed Forces & Society, 45(2): 268–290.

Huntington, S. P. 1957. The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 534 р.

Janowitz, M. 1960. The Professional Soldier, a Social and Political Portrait. Glencoe, ILL,: Free Press, 464 р.

Kachtan D. G., Binks E. 2020. Soldiers' Perceptions and Expectations of Converting Military Capital – The Cases of Israeli and British Militaries. Sociological Inquiry, 1. DOI: 10.1111/soin.12397.

Laanepere, T., Kasearu K. 2020. Military and Civilian Field–Related Factors in Estonian Reservists’ Military Service Readiness. Armed Forces & Society, August. DOI:10.1177/0095327X20944093.

Cooper L., Caddick N., Godier L., Cooper A., Fossey M., Engward H. A model of military to civilian transition: Bourdieu in action. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 3 (2): 53–60.

Moelker R., Soeters J. 2008. Van Doorn and Beyond from Teaching Sociology to Interdisciplinary, Problem-Based Learning in Dutch Officer Training. Armed Forces & Society, 35 (1): 36–48.

Pendlebury J. 2019. Bourdieu in the military: the field of officer training in three air forces. In: Soili Paananen & Antti-Tuomas Pulkka (eds.): Processes and practices in military training and education, Helsinki, National Defence University Department of Leadership and Military Pedagogy, 21–40.

Polin B. A., Ehrman C.M. 2020. The Curious Relationship Between Military Service and Entrepreneurial Intentions in Israel. Armed Forces & Society, 46(3): 438–453.

Roth-Dauquet K. Schaeffer F. 2006. AWOL: The Unexcused Absence of America's Upper Classes from Military Service – and How It Hurts Our Country. New York, Harper Collins, 272 р.

Swed O., Butler J.S. Military Capital in the Israeli Hi-tech Industry. 2015. Armed Forces & Society, 41(1): 123–141.


Abstract views: 363

Share

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Karlova, E. N. (2021). P. Bourdieu’s theory in military sociology: Military capital and professional mobility. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 46(2), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-2-263-273

Issue

Section

Sociology and social technologies